<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"><channel><title><![CDATA[The Lost Book of Sales]]></title><description><![CDATA[When intelligent people must sell.]]></description><link>https://www.lostbookofsales.com/</link><generator>Ghost 4.32</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 17:50:08 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Framework for running effective workshops]]></title><description><![CDATA[Sometimes, meetings can be brutal and spiral into endless, unproductive discussions that drain on everyone’s energy levels. We all know meetings that only end when the time runs out with no decisions having been made.]]></description><link>https://www.lostbookofsales.com/framework-for-running-effective-workshops/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">67561317de8bb00edaae2239</guid><category><![CDATA[Build 🏗]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Santeri]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jan 2025 19:37:15 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2025/01/lbs-mountains-fussen-sl.jpeg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2025/01/lbs-mountains-fussen-sl.jpeg" alt="Framework for running effective workshops"><p>Rather than driving <a href="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/notes/book-summary-art-of-action-by-stephen-bungay/">action</a>, they leave participants without clear direction or means to move forward.</p><p>This is where my insights from <a href="https://www.workshopper.com/post/interview-jonathan-courtney">Jonathan Courtney</a> come into play, and particularly his framework for running effective and interactive, action-oriented workshops. He is passionate about them and insists they can revolutionize how teams collaborate and achieve meaningful results.</p><h2 id="the-problem">The problem</h2><p>There are three common problems he noticed when working with some of the world&apos;s leading companies: </p><ol><li>Teams don&apos;t always know how to best start new projects. It&apos;s difficult for them to achieve consensus regarding what initiatives should be prioritized. </li><li>There is no unified, or robust system for how to run their projects, resulting in lack of alignment. Trying to decide on how to best run a project ends up taking longer than actually doing the work.</li><li>Finally, poor communication throughout the project ends up killing creativity because office politics and hierarchies get in the way. The by-product becomes a lot of wasteful talk with little progress and discussions that go nowhere.</li></ol><p>This results in disheartenend and frustrated professionals doing lots of &quot;busy work&quot; but with little actually getting done.</p><h2 id="what-is-the-goal-of-a-workshop-facilitator">What is the goal of a workshop facilitator?</h2><p>The singular goal of a workshop facilitator should be to help people unlock their superpowers. According to Jonathan, when people don&apos;t have to think about what processes to choose, they can focus on doing the work they were meant to do. With an effective workshop framework, a good facilitator should be able to land into any dysfunctional team and turn it into a powerhouse.</p><h2 id="become-a-good-workshop-facilitator">Become a good workshop facilitator</h2><p>According to Courtney, there are four key steps to becoming a good facilitator.</p><ol><li><strong>Mindset and theory </strong>- You have to understand the basic principles and mindset of workshop facilitators or &quot;workshoppers&quot;.</li><li><strong>Facilitation skills</strong> - You have to develop your ability to lead a team of any size through a workshop confidently along its entire duration. This requires improvisation skills, ability to manage team dynamics, and a keen eye for participants&apos; energy levels.</li><li><strong>The toolkit </strong>- Having tens of exercises to choose from and knowing how to combine them is a huge advantage. This will let you create even some of the most complex types of workshops with a lot of moving parts.</li><li><strong>Widely used &amp; proven workshop recipes </strong>- There&apos;s no need to reinvent the wheel as there are some tried and tested workshop principles already out there such as the <a href="https://amzn.to/42cK8kH">Design Sprint</a>. Having a handful of flexible recipes in your pocket means you won&apos;t have to create custom workshops from scratch.</li></ol><p>In this post we&apos;ll mainly focus on the first step.</p><h2 id="facilitation-principles">Facilitation principles</h2><p>The core principles that guide Courtney when designing a workshop are: </p><ol><li>Together, alone</li><li>Everything is anonymous</li><li>Creativity is a nice to have, but not essential</li></ol><p>Above can feel counter-intuitive at first, but when you look deeper, they make a lot of sense.</p><h3 id="together-alone">Together, alone</h3><p>Even when people sit at the same table, they should work individually. They shouldn&apos;t discuss or brainstorm next steps even if they work towards a common goal. They shouldn&apos;t speak or negotiate on how to best move forward. This counterintuitive idea is one of the best ways to avoid some of the major issues that pop up as part of team dynamics where extroverted people take all the control, and decision-makers start influencing everybody else in the room. The group&apos;s tendency will be to go along with the opinions of such members, or worst of all, end up not having any opinion at all. When you work &quot;together alone&quot;, you don&apos;t get influenced by colleagues, and in turn, this leaves you time and space to work through a solution.</p><h3 id="everything-is-anonymous">Everything is anonymous</h3><p>In the same way as with the principle of: &quot;Together, alone&quot;, this one has the added benefit of removing any bias towards a preconceived piece of the solution, helping participants be more adventurous. When drawing sketches, team members ideally shouldn&apos;t know who came up with what. When drawings or ideas are submitted anonymously, team members can vote without knowing who came up with them, helping everything stay more objective.</p><h3 id="creativity-is-nice-to-have-but-not-essential">Creativity is nice to have, but not essential</h3><p>Especially various design-thinking workshops have pushed the idea of requiring creativity. However, this results in putting a lot of people off who don&apos;t consider themselves creative. This is why workshops should be designed in a way where participants that don&apos;t consider themselves to be artistic or &quot;designery&quot; can still produce interesting, innovative and creative solutions. Workshops should ideally replace the need of being creative by providing a conducive environment and a step-by-step system to experiment with ideas while being guided every step of the way.</p><h2 id="workshop-supplies">Workshop supplies</h2><p>It is a good idea to keep some office supplies handy for an in-person workshop. This one is taken directly from Courtney&apos;s Workshopper playbook: </p><ul><li>Square sticky notes (two different colours)</li><li>Rectangular sticky notes (yellow)</li><li>1.5 large black markers per participant (bring more than needed)</li><li>Two different colors of sticky dots for voting</li><li>One empty sketching notebook per person</li><li>A block of plain printer paper</li><li>Adhesive whiteboard roll</li><li>Whiteboard markers</li><li>A timer clock</li></ul><h2 id="the-4cs-framework">The 4C&apos;s framework</h2><p>There&apos;s a clear pattern to most workshops out there, and using Courtney&apos;s four C&apos;s will fit any variation regardless of the topic, length or outcome:</p><ol><li>Collect</li><li>Choose</li><li>Create</li><li>Commit</li></ol><h3 id="collect">Collect </h3><p>In the beginning, there&apos;s always a stage having to do with infromation collection, be it challenges, ideas, inspiration, data, or anything else. This information must be visualized for all the participants. During the collect phase also the scope of work gets defined. This is especially important when the problems to solve are not all that clearly defined. </p><p><strong>Sample exercise: </strong></p><p>One exercise that is useful for the collect stage is the <a href="https://www.workshopper.com/post/best-exercises-for-problem-framing#toc-3-the-sailboat">sailboat</a>. The outcome of this exercise should be a categorized, non-prioritized list of challenges and issues. The duration is 30 minutes. Materials needed for the exercise can be the following: </p><ol><li>A whiteboard or a flip-chart. </li><li>A block of square sticky notes per participant</li><li>One sharpie per participant</li></ol><p>A preparatory step is to draw the sailboat, but as their first actual step, the team is tasked to think and work on what is moving the team forward, and what are the positive things (wind in the sail). Taking around 10 minutes, this serves as a nice preparatory warm-up before jumping into the challenges.<br><br>Next, the team moves over to the more negative part having to do with the challenges and problems. This is done in a more anonymous fassion. After 8 minutes of thinking and writing down, the team members are asked to stick their notes to the bottom (next to the anchor) in a rapid and random manner.</p><p>As the third step of the Collect-phase, after the facilitator identifies a single sample common group and adds a sticky note to it, the team is tasked to help categorize the rest of the sticky notes into logical groupings during the next 10 minutes. This is not about choosing what to prioritize to be worked on as that is done later, but the outcome is a vertical logical grouping of topics.</p><h3 id="choose">Choose</h3><p>Having collected enough data, it&apos;s time to select what to focus on and what to leave out. The team must know what it is working on so it doesn&apos;t create solutions to wrong or irrelevant challenges. During the choose stage, the workshop develops a clear direction that acts as the foundation for everything else.</p><p><strong>Sample exercise:</strong></p><p>One suitable exercise for this stage is the <a href="https://www.workshopper.com/post/decision-making-exercises#toc-1-dot-voting">dot voting</a>, where eight sticky dots are given out to each person. The outcome of this exercise is a prioritized list of challenges or ideas. Here, during the 8 minutes each team member thinks independently without having to discuss the topics with each other. Each member can vote also for their own sticky notes, and indeed, they can put as many sticky dots on each identified challenge or idea as they want. But remember, nobody is allowed to talk!</p><p>As the follow-up step taking approximately two minutes, everyone sits down and helps the facilitator arrange the ideas with most votes vertically in a descending order. </p><p>These issues, ideas or challenges can then be converted into <a href="https://www.workshopper.com/post/best-exercises-for-problem-framing#toc-1-how-might-we">opportunity questions</a> or &quot;How Might We&apos;s&quot; (HMWs).</p><h3 id="create">Create</h3><p>Once everyone is on the same page regarding the scope of work and other relevant information, it&apos;s time to create solutions. The solutions themselves shouldn&apos;t be final or even very detailed. What&apos;s important instead is creating a multitude of potential solutions.</p><p>This is where the team begins to truly flex their solution and ideation muscles. </p><p>Even as there are many exercises for the create stage out there, it&apos;s recommended to use something along the lines of mass idea generation at first, and only then idea prioritization. Among others, one good exercise for this is Coutney&apos;s <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJ2guxkhvKU&amp;ab_channel=AJ%26Smart">10-for-10</a>.</p><h3 id="commit">Commit</h3><p>Workshops are useless without actionable takeaways. Unless the workshop is only aimed at inspiring people, the commit phase is about the facilitator helping team members commit to a small number of solutions to be executed.</p><p>Because ideas are worth nothing without execution, a system for committing to ideas becomes critical. The goal here is to take our prioritized solutions and create a plan to actually make them happen.</p><figure class="kg-card kg-image-card"><img src="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2025/01/image.png" class="kg-image" alt="Framework for running effective workshops" loading="lazy" width="1064" height="646" srcset="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/size/w600/2025/01/image.png 600w, https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/size/w1000/2025/01/image.png 1000w, https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2025/01/image.png 1064w" sizes="(min-width: 720px) 720px"></figure><p>A fitting exercise for this stage is the <a href="https://www.workshopper.com/post/decision-making-workshop#toc-introduction-to-the-action-board-">action board</a> which uses the effort-impact matrix and combines it with a simple system for creating actionable tasks.</p><p>Because this is the last exercise in the last phase of your workshop in this case, you should really end it one on a high-note and give everyone a big high-five! You can also reflect on how much progress you&apos;ve achieved together!</p><p><em><em>If you liked this post or have any questions, consider subscribing to my occasional hand-made newsletter below. Talk to you soon!</em></em></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[LBS Newsletter #6: Simulation for all]]></title><description><![CDATA[Monte Carlo simulation for everyone, upcoming travels, river surfing & more.]]></description><link>https://www.lostbookofsales.com/newsletter/lbs-newsletter-6-simulation-for-everyone/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">671116cdb5bcc265d735b6e1</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Santeri]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 14:25:27 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2024/05/lbs-newsletter-boat.jpeg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2 id="recent-learnings-and-my-upcoming-travels-%F0%9F%8F%94%EF%B8%8F%F0%9F%87%B9%F0%9F%87%B7%F0%9F%87%AC%F0%9F%87%AA%F0%9F%87%AE%F0%9F%87%B9">Recent learnings and my upcoming travels &#x1F3D4;&#xFE0F;&#x1F1F9;&#x1F1F7;&#x1F1EC;&#x1F1EA;&#x1F1EE;&#x1F1F9;</h2><img src="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2024/05/lbs-newsletter-boat.jpeg" alt="LBS Newsletter #6: Simulation for all"><p>I was so intrigued about scenario analysis and Monte Carlo simulation after publishing my <a href="https://lutpub.lut.fi/handle/10024/166741">thesis</a> about the topic that after building an easy to use three-scenario <a href="https://www.simdss.com/">FPOM calculator</a> with Python Django, I went all-out and created an easy to use simulator add-on for Google sheets I called <a href="https://www.simdss.com/simulate/">Simulate</a>. After some back and forth with Google&#x2019;s review team it is now finally downloadable from the <a href="https://workspace.google.com/u/1/marketplace/app/simulate/1006097608813">Workspace Marketplace</a>!</p><figure class="kg-card kg-image-card"><img src="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2024/05/IMG_0172.JPG" class="kg-image" alt="LBS Newsletter #6: Simulation for all" loading="lazy" width="1684" height="1191" srcset="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/size/w600/2024/05/IMG_0172.JPG 600w, https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/size/w1000/2024/05/IMG_0172.JPG 1000w, https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/size/w1600/2024/05/IMG_0172.JPG 1600w, https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2024/05/IMG_0172.JPG 1684w" sizes="(min-width: 720px) 720px"></figure><p>Using Simulate, which is currently available in free public Beta, it is super easy to generate hundreds of scenarios simply by highlighting the variables you are uncertain about in your Google Sheet document and letting the simulator sample the specified ranges so you can better understand risks and uncertainties in your model. I firmly believe it will work with almost any model of yours, and I encourage you to try it out. Scenario thinking, analysis and better decisions for the win!!</p><p>I&#x2019;m so proud to have built something I myself will use, and if it&#x2019;s helpful and there will be more demand, I&#x2019;ll keep improving the tool in the future. However, for now, I&#x2019;ll just let it simmer for a while.</p><p>Oh &#x2013; and I&#x2019;ve also recently migrated most of my hosting over to Hetzner from Digital Ocean after learning about their great customer feedback, some of the industry&#x2019;s lowest prices and, most importantly, the fact that they originate from Bavaria &#x1F1E9;&#x1F1EA; (not so far from where I lived). And what&#x2019;s more, one of their main server locations is in Helsinki, Finland &#x1F1EB;&#x1F1EE;. So it looks like I&#x2019;m starting to bring some of my apps and infrastructure back closer to home!</p><p>The LBS blog will remain on Digital Ocean VPS in Amsterdam for now though, whereas the transition to Hetzner for <a href="http://simdss.com">Simulation DSS</a> was easy thanks to it being a fully dockerized application. I have to say I&#x2019;ve had some weird small performance issues with Hetzner in the beginning, but currently it seems to be stellar &#x2728;</p><hr><p>I&#x2019;ve recently gotten interested in fishing and I&#x2019;ll be storming some downstream rivers with my SUP board while sleeping the nights in shelters. I didn&#x2019;t even know it is possible to fish salmon in North Karelia close to some of these rivers! For now, when I still live close the pristine eastern Finland&apos;s wilderness areas, I want to get the best of it while I can! Here are some pictures from last summer as I was just getting into traveling on the thing:</p><figure class="kg-card kg-image-card"><img src="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2024/05/tinyfy.JPG" class="kg-image" alt="LBS Newsletter #6: Simulation for all" loading="lazy" width="2000" height="1125" srcset="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/size/w600/2024/05/tinyfy.JPG 600w, https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/size/w1000/2024/05/tinyfy.JPG 1000w, https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/size/w1600/2024/05/tinyfy.JPG 1600w, https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/size/w2400/2024/05/tinyfy.JPG 2400w" sizes="(min-width: 720px) 720px"></figure><figure class="kg-card kg-image-card"><img src="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2024/05/IMG_1815.JPG" class="kg-image" alt="LBS Newsletter #6: Simulation for all" loading="lazy" width="2000" height="1500" srcset="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/size/w600/2024/05/IMG_1815.JPG 600w, https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/size/w1000/2024/05/IMG_1815.JPG 1000w, https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/size/w1600/2024/05/IMG_1815.JPG 1600w, https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/size/w2400/2024/05/IMG_1815.JPG 2400w" sizes="(min-width: 720px) 720px"></figure><figure class="kg-card kg-image-card"><img src="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2024/05/IMG_1889-2.JPG" class="kg-image" alt="LBS Newsletter #6: Simulation for all" loading="lazy" width="2000" height="1246" srcset="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/size/w600/2024/05/IMG_1889-2.JPG 600w, https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/size/w1000/2024/05/IMG_1889-2.JPG 1000w, https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/size/w1600/2024/05/IMG_1889-2.JPG 1600w, https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/size/w2400/2024/05/IMG_1889-2.JPG 2400w" sizes="(min-width: 720px) 720px"></figure><p>Fun times, but this year I&#x2019;ll be hitting the rapids &#x1F4AA;&#x1F30A;&#x1F3C4;&#x200D;&#x2642;&#xFE0F;</p><hr><p>Thanks to my professors I&#x2019;m taking the chance to fly over to one of the world&apos;s oldest universities, University of Bologna in Italy &#x1F1EE;&#x1F1F9; to attend a Real Options conference where I&#x2019;ll meet some of this interesting field&#x2019;s most distinguished scholars and present a paper to the audience. This paper is my first proper academic publication in collaboration with some professors (and probably the last one, but you never know, haha) &#x1F913;&#x1F393;.</p><p>Additionally, in a couple of days, with one of my best friends I&#x2019;ll be flying to Istanbul from where we&#x2019;ll travel east and cross into Georgia to spend some time in the mountains while getting to know this beautiful country. I&#x2019;m super much looking forward to the trip! &#x1F1F9;&#x1F1F7;&#x1F1EC;&#x1F1EA;&#x1F3D4;&#xFE0F;</p><h2 id="new-article-account-development-%F0%9F%8C%AA%EF%B8%8F">New article: Account development &#x1F32A;&#xFE0F;</h2><p>&#x1F634; After the critical implementation stage, your strategic sales journey transitions into what is commonly labeled &quot;account maintenance&quot;, or more aptly, account development. Thinking of this crucial stage merely as &quot;maintenance&quot; is misleading because it implies a passive approach.</p><p>Per definition, whereas the word &quot;maintenance&quot; is about keeping things the way they are now, active account development is actionable and dynamic &#x26A1;&#xFE0F;</p><p>Continue <a href="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/account-development/">reading here</a>.</p><hr><h2 id="favorite-quote-%F0%9F%92%AD">Favorite quote &#xA0;&#x1F4AD;</h2><blockquote>You have to trust in something &#x2014; your gut, destiny, life, karma, whatever. This approach has never let me down, and it has made all the difference in my life &#x2013; Steve Jobs.</blockquote><hr><h2 id="random-remark-%F0%9F%93%96">Random remark &#xA0;&#x1F4D6;</h2><h3 id="a-note-to-myself-on-bold-writing">A note to myself on <strong>bold writing</strong></h3><p>Like most of us, I tend to gravitate towards hedging my words and using too many of them. Instead, I need to write boldly and make a point. Words like &#x201C;probably&#x201D;, &#x201C;maybe&#x201D;, &#x201C;could be&#x201D;, etc., feel good in the moment, but during the editing stage all this wariness should be removed in order to make a strong point that comes across loud and clear.</p><p>It&#x2019;s crazy to realize that nobody cares about my unclear carefully considered and thoroughly &#x201C;hedged&#x201D; points I put forward along with all the unclear nuance and complicated words. Hell, I might be losing you right now.</p><p>What the reader remembers instead are my boldest statements that I can proceed to discuss and analyze face-to-face if a need be. Provocative, bold and brave! It doesn&#x2019;t mean I&#x2019;m coming across as dumb, right?</p><p>Nobody will read my stuff otherwise &#x2013; I wouldn&#x2019;t. It all makes sense. But once again, this is mega difficult thing in practice. I&#x2019;ll keep learning.</p><hr><h2 id="end-note">End note</h2><p>As always, thank you for your time and for being a great subscriber! &#xA0;&#x1F389;</p><p>In case you find this stuff interesting or useful, I&apos;d be super thankful if you&apos;d <a href="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/#subscribe">share the LBS</a> with a friend or two.</p><p>Talk to you soon.</p><p>All the best, Santeri</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Account development]]></title><description><![CDATA[After the critical implementation stage, your strategic sales journey transitions into what is commonly labeled "account maintenance", or more aptly, account development. Thinking of this crucial stage merely as "maintenance" is misleading because it implies a passive approach.]]></description><link>https://www.lostbookofsales.com/account-development/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">671116cdb5bcc265d735b6dd</guid><category><![CDATA[Sell 🤝]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Santeri]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2024 08:32:00 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2024/01/LBS-SL-LAPLAND-post-cover-compressed.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2024/01/LBS-SL-LAPLAND-post-cover-compressed.jpg" alt="Account development"><p>Per definition, whereas the word &quot;maintenance&quot; is about keeping things the way they are now, active account development is actionable and dynamic. </p><p>Sometimes it happens on autopilot and your new customer will provide you follow-up access to other problems existing within the account. This way, if you&#x2019;re fortunate enough, you&apos;ll instantly be able start a new sales cycle and take things on from there. </p><p>When your product is already established at your customer&apos;s site, you&#x2019;ll find it easier to work with your internal sponsors resulting in less selling effort needed to close consecutive add-on deals. </p><p>However, sometimes things are not all that easy.</p><h3 id="the-importance-of-actively-developing-your-accounts">The importance of actively developing your accounts</h3><p>Account development is not a low priority hands-off process, but a strategic necessity. Neglecting existing accounts can lead to your competitors taking away your business. </p><p>A robust active account development strategy is your best bet to protect your customers from competitors&apos; advances and leverage your accounts for referrals and new sales opportunities. Particularly in niche markets, your reputation among customers can significantly influence your buyers&apos; decisions and provide synergies helping your clients do the selling for you. </p><h2 id="account-development-strategies">Account development strategies</h2><p>After closing your initial sale, it&#x2019;s unlikely there&apos;s any immediate business potential as your product tends to satisfy the current need until there are significant changes. Some salespeople will resort to waiting and occasionally calling their clients to ping whether there&apos;s anything new regarding the strategy or people while maintaining an overall passive stance.</p><p>According to Rackham, such a passive-static approach is one of the least successful and most expensive ways of doing business, rendering the distinction of breaking salespeople down into &#x201C;farmers&#x201D; and &#x201C;hunters&quot; wholly inadequate. </p><p>In order to protect your most important accounts from competition, your best defensive strategy may be going on the offensive and working on them actively by identifying additional business opportunities. </p><p>He lists five simple ways to ensure your current accounts are harnessed for maximum potential.</p><p><strong>1. Don&#x2019;t maintain, but actively develop your accounts: </strong>Without a clear sales goal, shifting over to simply maintaining good personal relationships and going for an occasional visit, lunch or a social chat will not be enough. This will not protect your account from competition. </p><p>The most successful salespeople Rackham studied looked actively for new opportunities instead of resorting to static maintenance. By turning every customer-care call into a consultative one attempting to extend their business they stood the greatest chance of protecting the business they had already won.</p><p><strong>2. Document the good news: </strong>During the most active phases of interacting with your accounts, and especially when problems come up during the <a href="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/after-sale-strategies-navigating-the-treacherous-implementation-stage/">implementation phase</a>, you&apos;ll tend to put a lot of effort into correcting any issues. </p><p>But what happens when things are done right? Most people are too busy to notice any smaller successes which continue going unrecorded, whereas problems incur ample documentation, emails and correspondence. As the good things don&apos;t get remembered later down the road, an eventual new decision-maker who&apos;ll try to understand what happened can inevitably force you into a weaker position.</p><p>A simple good tip here is to ensure there&#x2019;s a positive trail of good things and successes, not only the problems. It&apos;s wise for the salesperson to collect and document the positives throughout the journey from people who are satisfied with the work being done. This way, when the renewal finally comes up in some years&apos; time, you&apos;ll be in a stronger position to ensure the smooth continuation of your business.</p><p><strong>3. Collect references, leads and recommendations:<strong> </strong></strong>Again, the issue with a satisfied customer is that the better you&apos;ve covered their need, the less there tends to be an immediate opportunity for any direct add-on business. But these sorts of customers are extremely valuable in their own right because you can ask them to serve as references for your other prospective clients. </p><p>Best yet, you can ask them openly for any potential leads to be contacted. A satisfied customer will often be more than willing to give the right introduction to a potential client in another company. </p><p>Remember again, however, that the enthusiasm might be at a temporary low during the implementation stage&#x2019;s <a href="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/after-sale-strategies-navigating-the-treacherous-implementation-stage/#the-motivation-dip">motivation dip</a>, so your best-bet would be to do this either very early or wait until your solution&#x2019;s installation is complete to gain maximum impact from getting introduced to new business leads.</p><p><strong>4. Don&#x2019;t trust your &#x201C;happy ears&#x201D; &#x2013; ongoingly re-assess your understanding of client&#x2019;s needs: </strong>Once or twice a year the more successful sales professionals tend to conduct a business review with their customers treating them as completely new sales opportunities. By looking deeper into and probing for any of their ever-changing needs they want to understand what is truly going on in their accounts. </p><p>However, even many of the experienced salespeople can at times convince themselves they already know all the needs of their present accounts, so they wrongfully consider it as a waste of their time. </p><p>Being an experienced coach, it happened to Rackham many times that after asking the skeptical salespeople to actually go into their accounts and try uncovering new needs, up to a half of the presently dormant customers revealed new potential business opportunities. </p><p>If it&apos;s not you who ongoingly re-assesses your customer&#x2019;s needs, it will be your competition that&apos;ll do it for you. Rest assured &#x2013; your competitors will continuously try to uncover and develop any needs you are neglecting.</p><p><strong>5. Impact and influence your client&#x2019;s future decision criteria:</strong> Even if your customer has no present need or cannot provide new leads, there&apos;s still a chance that by visiting you&#x2019;ll get a new sales opportunity. By having access and molding your clients current <a href="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/evaluation-of-options-differentiation-and-vulnerability-in-a-competitive-environment/">decision criteria</a> you can ensure that in the future your offering is perceived as stronger than that of your competitor. </p><p>The less effective salespeople tend to move on to talking about non-business topics when they don&#x2019;t see a new business need, but it&#x2019;s much more powerful to work on your client&apos;s current decision criteria if you can!</p><h3 id="one-non-obvious-strategic-error-to-avoid">One non-obvious strategic error to avoid</h3><p>When companies launch new products they tend to try and sell it to their key existing accounts first. This is a mistake resulting in wasted business potential. If your product or service is brand new, you are initially better off spending some time to gradually learn the best ways to sell it. </p><p>As salespeople in Rackham&#x2019;s experience are found to sell better when they talk about their customer&#x2019;s challenges instead of talking about their own products, the large amount of talking about your new shiny product&#x2019;s features could be a turn-off to your present clients. </p><p>Instead, start by introducing your newest products to your less important accounts and approach your key customers only when you&#x2019;ve learned to make a solid problem-based or needs-oriented sales call.</p><h3 id="concluding-note-on-account-development">Concluding note on account development</h3><p>The quote: &#x201C;If you&#x2019;re not improving, you&#x2019;re falling behind&#x201D; is apt here as your business relationships are never simply static. Like Rackham says, they&#x2019;re either getting better or they are decaying. Don&#x2019;t put yourself at ease by thinking your relationships will continue indefinitely while remaining impervious to competition. </p><p>Resting still and turning complacent can be one of the worst mistakes you can do with your current customers. In our market economy, what you may have done to your clients in the past is history, and the only thing which is important is what you can do for them today or tomorrow &#x2013; and this mentality is the essence of successful account development.</p><p><em>If you liked this post or have any questions, consider subscribing to my occasional hand-made newsletter below. Talk to you soon!</em></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[LBS Newsletter #5: Value of flexibility]]></title><description><![CDATA[What is the value of flexbility? New article, a book review and Hermann Hesse's quote on life and despair & more.]]></description><link>https://www.lostbookofsales.com/newsletter/lbs-newsletter-5-flexibility/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">671116cdb5bcc265d735b6e0</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Santeri]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2024 16:28:39 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2024/02/sl-lbs-newsletter5.JPG" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2 id="what-is-the-value-of-flexibility-%F0%9F%95%B0%EF%B8%8F-%F0%9F%92%B5">What is the value of flexibility? &#x1F570;&#xFE0F; &#x1F4B5;</h2><img src="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2024/02/sl-lbs-newsletter5.JPG" alt="LBS Newsletter #5: Value of flexibility"><p>To state a simple example, let&apos;s say you and me discuss starting a business. We&apos;d be splitting our shares in the venture 50-50, where both would need to dole out 1000 bucks towards the initial start-up capital totaling $2000.<br><br>You&apos;re kind of interested, but you are hesitating.<br><br>You have lots to bring to the table, but you&apos;re slightly worried of losing your $1000. Neither are you sure about the long-term potential of our amazing new business idea.<br><br>At this stage in life, you have other options and you&apos;re willing to walk away. <br><br>Sensing that you&apos;re on the edge &#x2013; what if I tell you that I value your expertise and knowledge so much that in order to sweeten the deal, I&apos;m ready to provide you an added incentive in terms of flexibility, or a clause in our shareholder agreement that would enable you to increase your share in our venture by additional 20% in three years time at certain pre-determined price? <br><br>If we become a success, I stand to greatly benefit from this too, right?<br><br>But I need you, so here you go, please have that precious additional upside. <br><br>Now &#x2013; you may think, this added upside seems indeed attractive... But what does it mean exactly? Proceeding onwards from here, we intensely ponder what other potential contractual options could we include to appropriately incentivize and better optimize the risks of our business relationship.<br><br>Coming back to the initial option where I offer you a 20% stake in three years&apos; time &#x2013; what is the price at which we should fix your right to acquire the 20% added stake in three years&apos; time? What is the value of this contractual option? What is the value of any number of other similar types of contractual options when negotiating between two or more parties trying to conclude a complex, large-scale business transaction or agreement? <br><br>As Warren Buffett said: &quot;Any option has value...&quot; <br><br>In fact, with the common simple market-traded financial options&apos; asymmetric characterstics that provide you the possibility but not the obligation to act, you can construct almost any kind of risk-payoff profile to suit your needs as visible in the picture below. <br><br>That, of course, comes at a cost. </p><figure class="kg-card kg-image-card kg-card-hascaption"><img src="https://mcusercontent.com/b685f871ace40d4f27925e159/images/030c3699-5c15-fb40-0df1-4f6e4425a139.png" class="kg-image" alt="LBS Newsletter #5: Value of flexibility" loading="lazy"><figcaption>Pictured are some of the more exotic option strategies.</figcaption></figure><p>What cost? <br><br>There are many tools out there to value options, but the whole topic is not as simple or clear-cut as you might think. <br><br>When we use strict formulaic tools to value flexibility, risk, or uncertainty, we might miss the bigger picture. One of Buffett&apos;s other taglines was that &quot;price is what you pay, value is what you get&quot;. <br><br>Indeed, I may be willing to pay more than you for something that&apos;s more valuable to me personally than it is for you. That&apos;s common sense. <br><br>Highly liquid markets are great for determining the price of things, but what if the thing in question is not actively traded? And more generally though, what is the value of flexibility? Could there be a value-unit for a single factor of uncertainty within a given system or a context? <br><br>Many questions...<br><br>Be it an engineering system or the flexility to abandon an R&amp;D project at a certain point in the unknowable future &#x2013; as uncertainty continues to gradually resolve over time, we&apos;ll eventually learn whether our project or an engineering design proves to be viable. It&apos;s exciting but risky, isn&apos;t it?<br><br>Such bets are, however, exactly how many companies compete and create value!<br><br>Fundamentally, these and other questions are about <a href="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/notes/the-almanack-of-naval-ravikant-by-eric-jorgenson/#leverage">controlling leverage,</a> the all-powerful force and wonder in our market economy and the financial system. It&apos;s almost like physics &#x2013; but enough of that physics envy already! <br><br>Anyhow, these things are exactly what I explored in my recently published <a href="https://lutpub.lut.fi/handle/10024/166741">Master&apos;s thesis</a> late last year, combining real options thinking with simulation-based methods and analytics. Check it out if you find these topics interesting. One of my main goals was to try and best explain these things in simple terms to the average reader! </p><figure class="kg-card kg-image-card"><img src="https://mcusercontent.com/b685f871ace40d4f27925e159/images/bc674a7d-bce3-1eb8-ec54-ae44b28cadad.jpg" class="kg-image" alt="LBS Newsletter #5: Value of flexibility" loading="lazy"></figure><p>Ohh, and I visited Boston, New York and Washington D.C. recently &#x2013; here&apos;s a photo of me at MIT, where in an elevator, I happened to run into my favorite professor <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Lo">Andrew Lo</a> who teaches finance at the Sloan school of management. What a great moment it was... I highly recommend his <a href="https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLUl4u3cNGP63B2lDhyKOsImI7FjCf6eDW">open finance lecture available on YouTube</a> recorded back in 2008 as the financial crisis unfolded. By now it has over a million views and counting, it&apos;s epic.<br><br>The man, the legend! &#x1F601;</p><hr><h2 id="new-article-after-sale-strategies-%E2%80%93-navigating-the-treacherous-implementation-stage-%F0%9F%A7%AD">New article: After-sale strategies &#x2013; Navigating the treacherous implementation stage &#x1F9ED;</h2><p><strong>&#x1F633;</strong> Sales professionals tend to relax too soon after concluding an agreement. Let&apos;s delve into the crucial but often treacherous stage that follows the closing of a deal &#x2013; the implementation phase of your product or solution.</p><p>If you think it&apos;s time to ease down and relax immediately after your deal is closed, think again because you may be wrong!</p><p>In strategic sales, it&apos;s incredibly common for salespeople to decrease their activity and involvement with their customers when signatures have been exchanged, whereas experienced sales professionals know the real work between your organizations is only about to begin.<br><br></p><figure class="kg-card kg-image-card kg-card-hascaption"><img src="https://mcusercontent.com/b685f871ace40d4f27925e159/images/24b5011c-ad9f-5dc1-77cb-181c247fb7d4.jpg" class="kg-image" alt="LBS Newsletter #5: Value of flexibility" loading="lazy"><figcaption>Stages of the implementation process. Adopted from Rackham (1991).</figcaption></figure><p> Continue <a href="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/after-sale-strategies-navigating-the-treacherous-implementation-stage/">reading here</a>.</p><hr><h1 id="the-art-of-action-by-stephen-bungay-%F0%9F%93%9D"><strong><strong>The Art of Action by Stephen Bungay &#x1F4DD;</strong></strong></h1><p><br><strong>&#x1F4C8; This book review has spiked the traffic on the LBS website</strong><br><br>And for a good reason too! I think it&apos;s one of the best (and most extensive) book summaries I&apos;ve written on the entire site, so feel free to check it out if you haven&apos;t already.</p><figure class="kg-card kg-image-card"><img src="https://mcusercontent.com/b685f871ace40d4f27925e159/images/4acd8577-5c1e-75dd-5e78-5a66b8506d35.jpg" class="kg-image" alt="LBS Newsletter #5: Value of flexibility" loading="lazy"></figure><p><br><a href="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/notes/book-summary-art-of-action-by-stephen-bungay/">The Art of Action by Stephen Bungay</a></p><h3 id="santeris-comment">Santeri&apos;s comment</h3><p>Many think that military principles and learnings should not have any bearing whatsoever on our civil lives, nor the management of contemporary organizations.<em>&quot;We are past this way of leading...&quot;</em> they say, and <em>&quot;You cannot manage today&apos;s people in this manner...&quot;</em></p><p>In essence, this book is the best effort so far to help correct the misunderstandings of what leadership under uncertainty is truly about and where the competitive pressures of &quot;opposing wills&quot; play-out on a constant basis &#x2013; in military and at war.<br><br>Stephen explains excellently why military principles can be an effective way to think about leading, while simultaneously laying out some core reasons for why you should care about any of this at all in the first place.</p><h3 id="two-outtakes-from-the-book"><br>Two outtakes from the book</h3><p><strong>&#x1F52E; Predictable versus an unpredictable environment</strong></p><p>In a stable and predictable environment, it is possible to make quite good plans by gathering and analyzing information. We can learn enough about the outside world and our position in it to set some objectives.</p><p>We know enough about the effects any actions will have to be able to work out what to do to achieve the objectives. We can then use a mixture of supervision, controls, and incentives to coerce, persuade, or cajole people into doing what we want. We can measure the results until the outcomes we want are achieved.</p><p>We can make plans, take actions, and achieve outcomes in a linear sequence with some reliability. If we are assiduous enough, pay attention to detail, and exercise rigorous control, the sequence will be seamless.</p><p>In an unpredictable environment, this approach quickly falters.</p><p>The longer and more rigorously we persist with it, the more quickly and completely things will break down. The environment we are in creates gaps between plans, actions, and outcomes:</p><ul><li>The gap between plans and outcomes concerns <strong>knowledge</strong>: It is the difference between what we would like to know and what we actually know. It means that we cannot create perfect plans.</li><li>The gap between plans and actions concerns <strong>alignment</strong>: It is the difference between what we would like people to do and what they actually do.</li><li>The gap between actions and outcomes concerns <strong>effects</strong>: It is the difference between what we hope our actions will achieve and what they actually achieve.</li></ul><p>We can never fully predict how the environment will react to what we do. It means that we cannot know in advance exactly what outcomes the actions of our organization are going to create.<br><br><strong>&#x1F396;&#xFE0F; Similarities between business and military</strong></p><p>The following is a description of the nature of combat from an academic thesis about the nature of military thought:</p><ul><li>Combat is an interaction between human organizations. It is adversarial, highly dynamic, complex, and lethal. It is grounded in individual and collective human behavior and conducted between organizations that are themselves complex. It is not determined, hence uncertain, and evolutionary. Critically, and to an extent in a way which we currently overlook, combat is fundamentally a human activity.</li></ul><p>Compare that passage with this one characterized by Bungay (author):</p><ul><li>Business is an interaction between human organizations. It is competitive, highly dynamic, complex, and risky. It is grounded in individual and collective human behavior and conducted between organizations that are themselves complex. It is not determined, hence uncertain, and evolutionary. Critically, and to an extent in a way which we currently overlook, business is fundamentally a human activity.</li></ul><p><a href="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/notes/book-summary-art-of-action-by-stephen-bungay/">Continue reading the full summary...</a></p><hr><h2 id="favorite-quote-%F0%9F%93%96">Favorite quote &#x1F4D6;</h2><p>&#x1F468;&#x200D;&#x1F4BB; One day, as I was writing my master&apos;s thesis at the university library, I took a short break to walk around proceeding to pick up a random book which seemed interesting.<br><br>What caught my attention was a beautiful quote by Hermann Hesse talking about life, fate and despair &#x2013; so why not share it with you.</p><p><strong>&#x201C;</strong><br>Fate was not kind, life was capricious and terrible, and there was no good or reason in nature. But there is good and reason in us, in human beings, with whom fortune plays, and we can be stronger than nature and fate, if only for a few hours.<br><br>And we can draw close to one another in times of need, and live to comfort each other. And sometimes when the black depths are silent, we can do even more.<br><br>We can then be gods for moments, stretch out a commanding hand and create things which were not there before and which, when they are created, continue to live without us.<br><br>Out of sounds, words and other frail and worthless things, we can construct playthings&#x2013;songs and poems full of meaning, consolation and goodness, more beautiful and enduring than the grim sport of fortune and destiny.<br><br>&#x2013; Hermann Hesse in <a href="https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/34352.Gertrude">Gertrude</a>.</p><hr><h2 id="predictive-versus-prescriptive-analytics-%F0%9F%A4%93">Predictive versus prescriptive analytics &#x1F913;</h2><p>In the world of machine learning and data science, all the rave is currently about predictive analytics and deep learning as driven by breakthroughs in employing the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformer_(deep_learning_architecture)">transformer architecture</a>. This way large language models (LLMs) are currently spearheading the proliferation of AI in our lives. <br><br>But what about prescriptive analytics and decision support systems (DSS)? <br><br>In my Master&apos;s thesis I studied how to better control leverage, value strategic options, and make more rational and better-informed strategic investment decisions using simulation and prescriptive analytics approaches. <br><br>Simply put, prescriptive analytics is about answering the question &quot;what should we do?&quot;, and here I&apos;ve stumbled upon the efforts of my supervising professor&apos;s Mariia Kozlova&apos;s work to extend our understanding of the value of simulation and decision support systems (DSS) in decision making. <br><br>She calls her method <a href="https://www.lut.fi/en/projects/simdec-simulation-decomposition">Simulation Decomposition</a>, or &quot;SimDec&quot;, which with its colorful output intrigues me as a powerful tool for sensitivity analysis and truly &quot;prescriptive&quot; analytics. I&apos;m confident that more people should familiarize themselves with it and try applying it to their analytical problems. <br><br>Here&apos;s the direct link to the <a href="https://www.simdec.fi/">SimDec website</a>. There you&apos;ll find interesting papers and open-source libraries for you to learn more, try it out and apply it to your data.</p><figure class="kg-card kg-image-card"><img src="https://mcusercontent.com/b685f871ace40d4f27925e159/images/b6140506-c027-0d10-56fa-424a09525e44.png" class="kg-image" alt="LBS Newsletter #5: Value of flexibility" loading="lazy"></figure><p>Let me know if you&apos;d like to learn more about simulation or real options methods in the future, and I can try to do a great compact write-up on these topics in one of my later newsletter issues or YouTube!</p><hr><h2 id="end-note">End note</h2><p>As always, thank you for your time and for being a great subscriber! &#xA0;&#x1F389; </p><p>In case you find this content interesting or useful, I&apos;d be super thankful if you&apos;d <a href="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/#subscribe">share the LBS</a> with a friend or two.<br><br>You can also directly reply to this email if you have any feedback I could incorporate into future issues. <br><br>Talk to you soon. <br><br>All the best,<br>Santeri</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[After-sale strategies: Navigating the treacherous implementation stage]]></title><description><![CDATA[Sales professionals tend to relax too soon after concluding an agreement.  Let's delve into the crucial but often treacherous stage that follows the closing of a deal – the implementation phase of your product or solution. ]]></description><link>https://www.lostbookofsales.com/after-sale-strategies-navigating-the-treacherous-implementation-stage/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">671116cdb5bcc265d735b6dc</guid><category><![CDATA[Sell 🤝]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Santeri]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2024 06:30:00 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2024/01/alvaro-reyes-qWwpHwip31M-unsplash.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2024/01/alvaro-reyes-qWwpHwip31M-unsplash.jpg" alt="After-sale strategies: Navigating the treacherous implementation stage"><p>If you think it&apos;s time to ease down and relax immediately after your deal is closed, think again because you may be wrong.</p><p>In strategic sales, it&apos;s incredibly common for salespeople to lower their activity and involvement with their customers when signatures are exchanged, whereas experienced sales professionals know the real work is only about to begin. </p><h3 id="the-capricious-implementation-stage">The capricious implementation stage</h3><p>Just as you think it&apos;s safe to reduce your intensity, there&#x2019;s another critical stage to bite you. Among the never ending hard work that&#x2019;s needed across the full spectrum of complex sales, you&apos;d think you&apos;ve deserved some rest &#x2013; and I understand you. However, not only does your competition never sleep, but your customer is only getting started with your solution, so the &quot;organizationally&quot; intense and hard work only begins.</p><p>Why?</p><p>What tends to ensue next is something along the lines of a psychological rollercoaster, and it&apos;s integral for the salesperson to remain sensitive and alert during this period. Even when modern companies have increasingly embraced customer success teams emphasizing a smooth handover to implementation or customer care functions, there are many reasons for you to stay on your toes.</p><p>You have to keep in mind that psychologically the implementation stage is surely one of the most anxious and fear-inducing periods for your customer. What if things go wrong, or if your buyer thinks they&apos;ve made a bad choice? Here their purchasing decision collides with reality and is about to be tested. </p><p>The time spent implementing your solution can be treacherous, but if you execute it well, it&apos;ll also become your most surefire way to get in a good word and generate additional revenue both inside and outside your account. </p><p>Because there have been promises made throughout the buying journey, now they must be delivered upon. </p><p>What can the seller do? </p><p>Let&#x2019;s first try to comprehensively understand the customer&#x2019;s point of view regarding the psychological rollercoaster of emotions and perceptions. </p><h3 id="the-psychological-stages-of-the-implementation-phase">The psychological stages of the implementation phase</h3><p>Continuing from Rackham&#x2019;s great book Managing Major Sales published in 1991, the implementation stage from the perspective of your customer&#x2019;s psychology can be roughly broken down into the following three parts illustrated below. Let&#x2019;s discuss each of these stages.</p><figure class="kg-card kg-image-card kg-card-hascaption"><img src="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2024/01/LBS-stages.JPG" class="kg-image" alt="After-sale strategies: Navigating the treacherous implementation stage" loading="lazy" width="2000" height="1416" srcset="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/size/w600/2024/01/LBS-stages.JPG 600w, https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/size/w1000/2024/01/LBS-stages.JPG 1000w, https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/size/w1600/2024/01/LBS-stages.JPG 1600w, https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/size/w2400/2024/01/LBS-stages.JPG 2400w" sizes="(min-width: 720px) 720px"><figcaption>Implementation stages. Adopted from Rackham (1991)</figcaption></figure><p><strong>1. The &quot;new toy&quot; stage</strong></p><p>Initially, there&#x2019;s excitement and curiosity. Customers eagerly explore your product, trying out low-effort tricks, seeking out quick wins and achieving some immediate small results. Sometimes, the more sophisticated users in your client&apos;s account may already be exploring the more unusual or &#x201C;techy&#x201D; aspects of your product before getting down to serious work.</p><p>If you think about it more generally, everyone tends to play around with things when they&apos;re new. This kind of play serves a good purpose by building-up confidence in your solution and especially because your buyer will start instantly justifying the correctness of their buying decision. </p><p>In terms of your sales strategy it&#x2019;s valuable for you to try and enable such behavior to the extent possible by building-in aspects that will quickly show first results for little initial effort. These kinds of quick wins will help support your client&#x2019;s overall adoption journey. </p><p>Finally, it&#x2019;s worth highlighting that just as with any high-technology solution, the &quot;new toy&quot; stage can happen with any other mundane, traditional, or a &#x201C;boring&#x201D; solution too. It may be just your 24/7 hotline that will be tried out, or some of your training content will be found amusing!</p><p><strong>2. The learning stage</strong></p><p>This is often the hardest stage of the implementation journey and it&apos;s where your client&#x2019;s confidence-levels can sink to crisis levels. Psychologically speaking, as it often happens, the benefits tend to come in proportion to the effort invested. After the initial &#x201C;new toy&#x201D; stage, the excuriating process of actually implementing your solution begins. </p><p>For your client this stage is a lot about learning &#x2013; and learning is hard work. </p><p>As depicted in the illustration, the effort needed for this stage tends to be higher than the results your customers are getting, making this part of implementation process extremely vulnerable. </p><p>This is just as true for any other type of learning you may have done. If you learned to play a musical instrument, started going to the gym or began riding a bicycle, you may have gotten discouraged when you ran into first difficulties.</p><p>When your client is in the process of installing your new advanced production system, during the early stages of implementation, it may still be easier for them to do things manually.</p><p>So what are some of the effects the customer perceives when having to invest all this effort?</p><p>As a rule of thumb, and especially for your less sophisticated clients, your buyer tends to underestimate the effort required to implement your solution, or the difficulty of getting the product to prove its full business value. </p><p>Your more advanced customers will tend to have less trouble during this &quot;learning stage&quot;, especially if they&#x2019;ve already implemented comparable solutions before. They tend to have a more realistic implementation plan helping them navigate and eventually achieve the full potential of your solution. Their past experience helps them cope with the many kinds of problems that arise with your less sophisticated customers.</p><p>A tip worth noting here is that for you as the seller, it is important to remain careful with using your client as a reference during this turbulent stage. It&#x2019;s likely that emotions may still be on a rollercoaster ride leading possibly to some unpredictable reactions. If your customer is having a low moment and you ask your other prospective customers to contact them about their experience at that moment... Well, it may be a bad idea.</p><p><strong>3. The effectiveness stage</strong></p><p>As your customer gains a better understanding of your solution, the effort that goes into learning it will decrease dramatically. Your product or service will begin to show its real value, and the customer starts realizing the tangible benefits leading to a renewed sense of appreciation and reliance on your solution. </p><p>Here you&#x2019;ve managed to navigate through the treacherous psychological stages of the implementation process and have began reaching the winning side of the overall project. </p><p>According to Rackham, if your customer says something along the lines of: &#x201C;I could never go back to the old way of doing things&#x201D;, or &#x201C;How did we ever manage without it&#x201D; &#x2013; your implementation can surely be considered a success!</p><h3 id="the-motivation-dip">The &quot;motivation dip&quot;</h3><p>Helping understand the three previous implementation stages, Rackham also introduced the concept of the &#x201C;motivation dip&#x201D; illustrated below. It shows your customer&#x2019;s level of enthusiasm and how it changes across the implementation process. </p><figure class="kg-card kg-image-card kg-card-hascaption"><img src="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2024/01/LBS-motivation.JPG" class="kg-image" alt="After-sale strategies: Navigating the treacherous implementation stage" loading="lazy" width="2000" height="1416" srcset="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/size/w600/2024/01/LBS-motivation.JPG 600w, https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/size/w1000/2024/01/LBS-motivation.JPG 1000w, https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/size/w1600/2024/01/LBS-motivation.JPG 1600w, https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/size/w2400/2024/01/LBS-motivation.JPG 2400w" sizes="(min-width: 720px) 720px"><figcaption>Motivation dip. Adopted from Rackham (1991)</figcaption></figure><p>Let&apos;s describe what we&apos;re seeing here. </p><p>At first, right after concluding the agreement, your client&#x2019;s motivation is high, but after the &#x201C;new toy&#x201D; stage is over, your customer&#x2019;s high expectations and motivation tend to start melting away. </p><p>Enthusiasm continues to drop rapidly as your customer proceeds to the middle parts of the learning stage. </p><p>As I briefly mentioned earlier, this not only happens with purchasing decisions, but remains a commonplace aspect in our everyday psychology.</p><p>When you start a new sport, despite your initial excitement, the magic tends to wear off quickly, and most people will experience a dip in their motivation. Many if not most will get discouraged. </p><p>Working with your customers, this is exactly where the value of your attentiveness and sensitivity grows in importance.</p><p>Continuing the sports analogy, the hobbyist may want to resort to old habits as the motivation continues to dissipate.</p><p>This is a high-risk phase for implementing any sort of change, whether we&#x2019;re talking about simple weight loss and dietary discipline, or implementing a billion dollar installation. Here it is absolutely critical to put in extra effort as your customers are working hard but may not yet see the results they expect. </p><p>If the seller was painting a rosy picture leading to the customer expecting an easy time, they&#x2019;ll come unprepared for the collapse in motivation when faced with real-world challenges that are bound to arise.</p><p>What is positive, however, is that the motivation dip doesn&#x2019;t last. If you and your client can bear through it all, the effort will start paying off and the results will come. </p><p>With your sports hobby, you may see your technique start improving, or your weight start noticeably going down. Maybe you&apos;re now finally able to play an increasingly difficult composition with your instrument along with the song you so much love. </p><p>When results become visible, the motivation increases again and it&apos;s exactly what happens in the &quot;effectiveness stage&quot;. This is when your solution finally proves itself and starts paying off. In order to reach it, however, you&#x2019;ll need to put in quite some effort to survive the motivation dip! </p><h3 id="strategies-for-handling-the-motivation-dip">Strategies for handling the motivation dip</h3><p>After studying hundreds of customer engagements, Rackham identified three main strategies the more successful salespeople tend to use to ensure their customers get through the motivation dip with less difficulty. </p><p><strong>1. Start before signing the contract: </strong>During the installation, your anxious client may be particularly sensitive to any signs of things going wrong. Naturally, because of this anxiety, they can overreact when faced with smaller difficulties. If you&#x2019;ve done good work earlier in the sales cycle, your buyer will be less prone to overreacting when any of the inevitable difficulties arise. </p><p>One area important for resolving implementation anxiety comes from the earlier <a href="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/evaluation-of-options-differentiation-and-vulnerability-in-a-competitive-environment/">evaluation of options</a> stage in the buying process. If you&#x2019;ve ensured your customer genuinely perceives the product you offer as matching their decision criteria better than your competition, you&#x2019;ll be half-way there with removing the most dreadful aspects of your client&#x2019;s worries. </p><p>Likewise, your handling of any possible <a href="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/consequence-issues-how-resolving-buyer-concerns-makes-or-breaks-complex-deals/">consequence issues</a> is important before signing the contract.</p><p>If any unresolved issues remain lingering under the surface, your buyer will readily expect things to go wrong. This way the customer will focus heavily on any faults and remain blind to any of the positive successes happening across your implementation process.</p><p><strong>2. Involve your customer:</strong> As I&#x2019;ve discussed in one of my previous posts regarding the many psychological aspects at play in the <a href="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/the-principle-of-reciprocity-and-becoming-a-good-negotiator/">process of negotiating</a>, it may be a good idea to involve your customer in the process of planning your implementation and facilitating the needed change. </p><p>Generally speaking, bringing about any sort of change is difficult, and it&apos;s double-difficult if you&#x2019;re trying to impose it on someone else. Making a detailed installation plan, and going step-by-step with your client through this process will require their input which serves as a yet another avenue for introducing your product and maximizing the chances of your implementation&apos;s success. </p><p>No surefire guarantees exist against unexpected problems, but if you&#x2019;ve involved your customer early, they&apos;re likely to be more forgiving when problems spring up. </p><p>In short, customer&apos;s stake and motivation in the project will help make it a success. </p><p><strong>3. Put in effort early:</strong> People who&#x2019;ve proven to be effective in implementing new ideas or paving the way for adopting new organizational processes know that concentrating your most significant effort in the early stages is critical. </p><p>Mediocre sales professionals don&#x2019;t know about these three implementation stages or the motivation dip, so when they see an excited client during the &#x201C;new toy&#x201D; stage, they&apos;ll think it will remain this way throughout the entire implementation journey. They proceed to give their account less attention failing to pick up on any of the warning signs that can lead to problems within their account. In the learning stage, mediocre sales professionals are taken by surprise and tend to wait too long to take corrective action. </p><p>Not acting upon these problems promptly will tend to exaggerate them leading to further frustration and dissatisfaction. As Rackham says, &#x201C;fire prevention is a better strategy than firefighting&#x201D;, and the motivation dip is far easier to handle if you put in your effort early on. </p><p>Make sure there&apos;s less of a chance for fires to break out in the first place &#x2013; and you are half-way there. </p><p><em>In a future post, I&#x2019;ll discuss transitioning from the implementation stage into active account development. For updates on this and more, consider subscribing to my very occasional hand-made newsletter below. Talk to you soon!</em></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sales strategies for today’s dynamic market]]></title><description><![CDATA[Explore key strategies for modern sales success, covering essential aspects like enhancing sales team performance, mastering the sales process, and employing effective sales forecasting and outbound tactics.]]></description><link>https://www.lostbookofsales.com/sales-strategies-for-todays-dynamic-market/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">671116cdb5bcc265d735b6df</guid><category><![CDATA[📚 Wiki]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[LBS Wiki Staff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 07:58:05 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1588362993297-0a0da36f268d?crop=entropy&amp;cs=tinysrgb&amp;fit=max&amp;fm=jpg&amp;ixid=M3wxMTc3M3wwfDF8c2VhcmNofDc1fHxoZWxzaW5raXxlbnwwfHx8fDE3MDY2ODgwMDZ8MA&amp;ixlib=rb-4.0.3&amp;q=80&amp;w=2000" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1588362993297-0a0da36f268d?crop=entropy&amp;cs=tinysrgb&amp;fit=max&amp;fm=jpg&amp;ixid=M3wxMTc3M3wwfDF8c2VhcmNofDc1fHxoZWxzaW5raXxlbnwwfHx8fDE3MDY2ODgwMDZ8MA&amp;ixlib=rb-4.0.3&amp;q=80&amp;w=2000" alt="Sales strategies for today&#x2019;s dynamic market"><p>n the fast-paced world of sales, mastering the sales process is more than a skill&#x2014;it&apos;s an art. As sales teams navigate through the complexities of the sales cycle, understanding and leveraging each phase becomes critical. This article delves into innovative strategies for enhancing the sales process, boosting sales team performance, and accurately forecasting sales outcomes.</p><p><strong>The Sales Process: A Roadmap to Success</strong></p><p>The sales process serves as the backbone of successful sales activities. It&apos;s a structured approach that guides sales teams from initial contact to closing deals. By systematically understanding customer needs, building relationships, and presenting solutions, sales professionals can navigate the sales cycle more effectively, increasing the likelihood of successful outcomes.</p><p><strong>Enhancing the Sales Team&apos;s Performance</strong></p><p>Empowering sales teams begins with training and resources. Comprehensive training programs, combined with ongoing learning opportunities, enable sales teams to refine their skills and adapt to evolving market trends. Effective sales management also involves fostering a collaborative environment where team members can share insights and strategies.</p><p><strong>The Art of the Sales Forecast</strong></p><p>Accurate sales forecasting is essential for strategic planning and resource allocation. Utilizing data-driven tools and CRM systems, sales managers can analyze past performance, market trends, and customer behaviors to predict future sales. This not only helps in setting realistic targets but also in identifying potential challenges and opportunities.</p><h3 id="learning-to-sell-an-evolving-journey">Learning to Sell: An Evolving Journey</h3><p>Selling is a skill that evolves with experience and continuous learning. Sales professionals must stay abreast of the latest techniques and market dynamics. Resources like sales workshops, online courses, and industry seminars provide valuable insights and practical tips for improving sales effectiveness.</p><h3 id="strategies-to-increase-sales">Strategies to Increase Sales</h3><p>To increase sales, it&apos;s important to focus on both inbound and outbound strategies. While inbound sales focus on attracting customers through content and online presence, outbound sales involve proactive outreach through sales calls, emails, and meetings. A balanced approach, tailored to your market and customer base, is key to driving sales growth.</p><p><strong>Optimizing Outbound Sales and Calls</strong></p><p>Outbound sales, particularly sales calls, require a strategic approach. Understanding the customer&apos;s needs and challenges, personalizing the conversation, and clearly communicating the value proposition are essential components of successful sales calls. Regular training and role-playing exercises can help sales teams hone their outbound sales skills.</p><h3 id="conclusion">Conclusion</h3><p>In conclusion, mastering the sales process in today&#x2019;s market requires a combination of strategic planning, team empowerment, continuous learning, and leveraging the right tools and techniques. By adopting these approaches, sales teams can not only meet but exceed their targets, driving growth and success in an increasingly competitive landscape.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Navigating the sales ecosystem: Advanced tools for the modern sales force]]></title><description><![CDATA[In this article, we explore advanced tools reshaping modern sales, from AI-driven CRMs and analytics to e-learning platforms. The focus is on strategically using these technologies to enhance customer relations and drive sales success.]]></description><link>https://www.lostbookofsales.com/navigating-the-sales-ecosystem-advanced-tools-for-the-modern-sales-force/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">671116cdb5bcc265d735b6de</guid><category><![CDATA[📚 Wiki]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[LBS Wiki Staff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 06:42:32 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1496180470114-6ef490f3ff22?crop=entropy&amp;cs=tinysrgb&amp;fit=max&amp;fm=jpg&amp;ixid=M3wxMTc3M3wwfDF8c2VhcmNofDE3fHxjYWxsJTIwdG9vbHN8ZW58MHx8fHwxNzA2Njg3MzA5fDA&amp;ixlib=rb-4.0.3&amp;q=80&amp;w=2000" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1496180470114-6ef490f3ff22?crop=entropy&amp;cs=tinysrgb&amp;fit=max&amp;fm=jpg&amp;ixid=M3wxMTc3M3wwfDF8c2VhcmNofDE3fHxjYWxsJTIwdG9vbHN8ZW58MHx8fHwxNzA2Njg3MzA5fDA&amp;ixlib=rb-4.0.3&amp;q=80&amp;w=2000" alt="Navigating the sales ecosystem: Advanced tools for the modern sales force"><p>In the dynamic world of modern sales, success hinges not just on personal skills but on leveraging an array of sophisticated tools. These tools, often underutilized or misunderstood, can dramatically reshape sales strategies and team dynamics in large corporations.</p><p><strong>1. Advanced CRM Solutions:</strong> Beyond basic customer management, advanced CRM systems now offer predictive analytics, integrating AI to forecast sales trends and customer behaviors. They&apos;re evolving from data repositories to insightful decision-making tools.</p><p><strong>2. Integrated Communication Platforms:</strong> Tools like Slack and Microsoft Teams have revolutionized team communication. Integrated with CRMs, these platforms facilitate real-time discussions, document sharing, and seamless collaboration, making remote sales teams as cohesive as in-person ones.</p><p><strong>3. Sales Enablement Platforms:</strong> Platforms like Highspot and Showpad go beyond simple content management. They provide analytics on content usage, effectiveness, and customer engagement, offering invaluable insights for tailoring sales strategies.</p><p><strong>4. AI-Powered Sales Automation:</strong> Automation tools now harness AI to personalize customer interactions at scale. They analyze customer data to tailor follow-up emails and content, ensuring each lead receives a highly personalized sales experience.</p><p><strong>5. Data-Driven Analytics Tools:</strong> Tools like Tableau or Power BI transform sales data into actionable insights. They offer customizable dashboards that track key performance indicators, giving sales managers a powerful lens into team performance and market trends.</p><p><strong>6. E-Learning and Development Platforms:</strong> Continuous learning is vital. Platforms like LinkedIn Learning and Coursera offer courses in everything from negotiation skills to advanced analytics, ensuring sales teams stay at the forefront of industry knowledge.</p><p><strong>7. Enhanced Mobile Capabilities:</strong> Mobile CRM apps now offer much more than access to customer data. They enable on-the-go deal management, real-time updates, and even location-based insights, empowering sales reps to be effective from anywhere.</p><p><strong>Key Strategies for Leveraging These Tools:</strong></p><ul><li><strong>Data-Driven Decision Making:</strong> Use analytics tools to make informed decisions based on market trends and customer behaviors.</li><li><strong>Personalized Customer Journeys:</strong> Utilize AI-powered automation to create customized experiences for each lead or customer.</li><li><strong>Continuous Learning and Adaptation:</strong> Engage with e-learning platforms to keep skills sharp and knowledge current.</li></ul><p><strong>Avoiding Common Pitfalls:</strong></p><ul><li><strong>Overreliance on Automation:</strong> Balance automated interactions with personal touchpoints to maintain genuine customer relationships.</li><li><strong>Underutilizing Data Insights:</strong> Ensure the data collected is actively used to inform sales strategies and operational improvements.</li></ul><p>In conclusion, the modern sales professional&#x2019;s toolkit is rich with advanced technologies. From AI-driven CRM systems to sophisticated data analytics and beyond, these tools are reshaping the art of sales. However, the real mastery lies in strategically utilizing these resources to enhance relationships, drive sales, and stay ahead in a competitive landscape.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consequence issues: How resolving buyer concerns makes or breaks complex deals]]></title><description><![CDATA[In high-stakes sales, recognizing consequence issues can be critical, but  paradoxically this stage often goes completely unnoticed. As someone deeply immersed in this field, I've seen how complexity and risks escalate hand-in-hand with your deal size.]]></description><link>https://www.lostbookofsales.com/consequence-issues-how-resolving-buyer-concerns-makes-or-breaks-complex-deals/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">671116cdb5bcc265d735b6db</guid><category><![CDATA[Sell 🤝]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Santeri]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2024 18:30:05 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2024/01/santeri-liukkonen-uI-73-Wgt9E-unsplash-min.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2024/01/santeri-liukkonen-uI-73-Wgt9E-unsplash-min.jpg" alt="Consequence issues: How resolving buyer concerns makes or breaks complex deals"><p>There&#x2019;s a common critical stage in many sales processes that demands your attention and it&apos;s about addressing your customer&apos;s concerns lingering under the surface. This is something for you to consider before stepping into negotiating and finalizing your complex deal. Overlooking what&apos;s discussed below may completely jeopardize your entire effort until this moment, so watch out!</p><p>Whereas in smaller transactions the risks are more contained, in strategic enterprise sales, the risks aren&#x2019;t just higher &#x2013; they multiply. We&#x2019;re dealing with situations involving more stakeholders, increased competition, and prolonged decision-making timelines. Each of these elements can introduce unforeseen challenges. </p><p>Just as the complexity of your solution tends to increase, so do your client&apos;s apprehensions, worries and anxieties.</p><p>Insights from Neil Rackham&#x2019;s book &quot;Managing Major Sales&quot; have been invaluable to me, especially regarding what he calls the &quot;resolution of concerns&quot; stage of a complex deal. This isn&#x2019;t something that is encountered in every sale, but it&#x2019;s something crucial for you to keep in mind when trying to conclude any sort of a larger agreement.</p><p>In my experience, buyers&apos; fears vary greatly. Some might be straightforward, like concerns about timely delivery or worries with the installation. Others, however, are more sinister. They can be deep underlying trust issues in your ability to deliver, or they may have to do with buyer&apos;s own doubts of driving organizational acceptance for changes that are needed. </p><p>Such kinds of deeper psychological concerns having to do with human emotions, egos and perceptions are what Rackham refers to as &quot;consequence issues&quot;, and they can be the silent deal-breakers if not recognized and addressed effectively.</p><h3 id="objectives-of-the-pre-negotiation-stage">Objectives of the pre-negotiation stage</h3><ul><li>Determine whether consequence issues exist.</li><li>Clarify and understand these issues.</li><li>Aid the client in navigating and resolving these concerns. It&#x2019;s important to remember that resolution of these issues lie with the client, not with you as the seller.</li></ul><h3 id="understanding-the-roots-of-consequence-issues">Understanding the roots of consequence issues</h3><p>Consequence issues are essentially the risks or downsides that a client perceives possibly resulting from deciding in your favor. Often, these are disguised as concerns about pricing, which are the more acceptable way to express deeper underlying issues to the seller. Noticeably, price concerns tend to fluctuate, dipping in the middle of the sales cycle and peaking again later when discussions pivot towards finalizing the deal.</p><figure class="kg-card kg-image-card kg-card-hascaption"><img src="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2024/01/sl-lbs-customer-concerns.JPG" class="kg-image" alt="Consequence issues: How resolving buyer concerns makes or breaks complex deals" loading="lazy" width="2000" height="1416" srcset="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/size/w600/2024/01/sl-lbs-customer-concerns.JPG 600w, https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/size/w1000/2024/01/sl-lbs-customer-concerns.JPG 1000w, https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/size/w1600/2024/01/sl-lbs-customer-concerns.JPG 1600w, https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2024/01/sl-lbs-customer-concerns.JPG 2000w" sizes="(min-width: 720px) 720px"><figcaption>Adopted from Rackham (19991).</figcaption></figure><p>The pattern in price concern visible in the illustration above can be attributed to a shift in focus during the deal cycle &#x2013; from initially understanding the benefits of a solution to then starting weighing the costs versus benefits and finally to negotiating and concluding the agreement. The cost side of the buyer&apos;s equation may not encompass just the price tag itself but any amount of other potential risks such as implementation challenges, internal politics or other hassles.</p><p>Research done by Rackham indicates that in many instances, price concerns are a facade for other, more intricate issues. It&#x2019;s simpler for clients to attribute their hesitation to cost rather than to delve into more nuanced issues like trust problems or other potential risks. As such, price often serves as a convenient smokescreen for other possible deeper underlying concerns.</p><h3 id="identifying-consequence-issues">Identifying consequence issues</h3><p>Spotting these sorts of consequence issues demands sensitivity and a keen eye for noticing their typical manifestations and recognizing characteristics of situations where they tend to arise. Here are some factors that are conductive for consequence issues to start lingering under the hood without manifesting themselves openly to the seller:</p><ul><li><strong>Scale of decision</strong>: &#xA0;Is the decision significant for the buyer?</li><li><strong>Visibility and pressure</strong>: Is there pressure related to decision&apos;s visibility in your customer&apos;s organization? Would the impact resulting from your product or solution&apos;s be felt across your customer&apos;s entire enterprise? </li><li><strong>Competitive landscape</strong>: Are there established or existing competitors present or trying to enter into the account?</li><li><strong>Technological unfamiliarity</strong>: Does your product or service represent a significant departure from familiar technology? This can heighten your client&apos;s risk perception.</li></ul><p>Some concrete indicators of existing consequence issues may include the constant resurfacing of old issues that you thought you had already addressed and resolved with your client. The price concerns may be completely disproportionate, or unexplained delays or sudden changes in your <a href="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/selling-indirectly-to-decision-makers/">accessibility to previously available decision-makers</a> may come up. Any of these signs can point to underlying concerns lingering beneath the surface that the client is hesitant to voice.</p><h3 id="handling-consequence-issues">Handling consequence issues</h3><p>Recognizing consequence issues is the initial step. Effectively addressing them requires a nuanced, empathetic approach. In short, here is what you must consider in your deals:</p><ol><li><strong>Recognize and acknowledge their existence</strong>: Ignoring these issues doesn&apos;t make them vanish. Being aware of their potential impact is crucial.</li><li><strong>Build trust and cultivate relationships early</strong>: Establishing a foundation of trust early in the sales cycle is key for a more open dialogue later down the road.</li><li><strong>Help the client resolve their issues:</strong> The resolution of consequence issues is ultimately up to the client and their journey. Your role is to facilitate a conducive environment for their resolution. Don&apos;t make the mistake of trying to overcome them forcefully.</li></ol><p>Rackham cautions against three critical mistakes sellers tend to make when trying to manage consequence issues &#x2013; (1) minimizing, (2) prescribing, and (3) pressuring. This only aggravates the problems instead of aiding in their resolution.</p><h3 id="actions-to-avoid-and-the-deadly-sins">Actions to avoid and the &quot;deadly sins&quot;</h3><p>Navigating consequence issues is akin to a tightrope walk &#x2013; it requires a delicate balance. While it&#x2019;s crucial to recognize and address these issues, how you approach them can significantly impact the outcome. In my experience, and as aptly stated by Rackham, there are certain pitfalls that we, as sales professionals, must consciously avoid to ensure we don&apos;t inadvertently compound these issues:</p><ol><li><strong>Minimizing client&apos;s concerns</strong>: One of the most common missteps is to belittle or downplay your buyer&apos;s concerns. It&#x2019;s easy to fall into the trap of reassuring them with a simple &#x201C;Don&#x2019;t worry about it,&#x201D; or &#x201C;It&#x2019;s not a big deal.&#x201D; However, this approach can backfire. It might come off as dismissive, suggesting that you are not fully acknowledging the weight of their concerns. This can drive the real issues underground, allowing significant concerns to remain hidden and unresolved. It&#x2019;s essential to validate the client&apos;s worries, showing that you understand and take them seriously.</li><li><strong>Prescribing solutions</strong>: Another pitfall is jumping too quickly to offer solutions. In the eagerness to resolve the issue, you might start providing recommendations or dictating how the client should address their concerns. However, consequence issues are not your typical straightforward problems; they are often complex, involving layers of emotions and perceptions. Offering solutions too early, especially before fully understanding the problem, can lead to increased resistance from the client. It&#x2019;s more about guiding them to find their own solutions rather than dictating your own. This is not so different from how psychologists or counselors tend to help their clients with various types of complex emotional problems and perceptive issues they may have.</li><li><strong>Exerting Pressure</strong>: In sales, there&#x2019;s always a temptation to push a little to close the deal, especially when we&#x2019;re so close to the finish line. However, applying pressure in situations where deeper consequence issues are at play can be counterproductive. It can heighten the client&apos;s stress and amplify their concerns, making them even more hesitant to commit. The key is to give them space and time to process and decide. High-pressure tactics, which might work in simpler sales scenarios, can often backfire in complex, high-stakes situations.</li></ol><p>In handling consequence issues, it&#x2019;s paramount to tread carefully. Depending on the type of sale and situation at hand, before starting negotiations, our role could be thought of as being facilitators &#x2013; someone who listens, understands, and helps the client navigate through their concerns, rather than pushing the sale with force. </p><p>Your focus should remain on building trust, creating a safe space for open discussion, and guiding our clients towards finding their own resolution to any of their possible deeper emotional, perceptive or organizational issues and concerns. It&#x2019;s a subtle art, requiring patience and empathy, but mastering this can significantly enhance our effectiveness as sales professionals acting in a complex environment.</p><h3 id="concluding-thoughts">Concluding thoughts</h3><p>During late stages of the sales cycle, understanding and managing consequence issues is essential. This article has highlighted the tell-tale signs of such issues, the intricacies of addressing them, and the importance of fostering trust and relationships early on in the sales process. It&#x2019;s crucial to remember that resolving these issues lies with the client. What we can do as sellers is to identify these concerns and bring them out of obscurity and on the table to be dealt with more effectively. Avoiding the trap of minimizing, prescribing, and pressuring is key to navigate these complex scenarios with professionalism and tact, resulting in better deals and more impact. </p><p><em>If you enjoyed this post, remember to subscribe below. You&apos;ll get an occasional hand-made email right into your inbox. I&apos;ll do my best to make it interesting and I won&apos;t waste your time. You&apos;ll be able to unsubscribe at any time. Talk to you soon!</em></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Evaluation of options: Differentiation and vulnerability in a competitive environment]]></title><description><![CDATA[Sales is often about fierce competition where companies vie for customers' attention and loyalty. What can you do to outshine your competition and differentiate in a crowded market?]]></description><link>https://www.lostbookofsales.com/evaluation-of-options-differentiation-and-vulnerability-in-a-competitive-environment/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">671116cdb5bcc265d735b6da</guid><category><![CDATA[Sell 🤝]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Santeri]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2023 15:26:15 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2023/06/sl-frankfurt-lbs.jpeg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2023/06/sl-frankfurt-lbs.jpeg" alt="Evaluation of options: Differentiation and vulnerability in a competitive environment"><p>Welcome to the world of hard and soft differentiation, a less understood way to propel successful sales strategies. We will continue our journey of elevating the sales professional&apos;s role from a transactional job to a consultative one.</p><p>In complex sales, understanding micro and macro differentiation is crucial. Macro differentiation is about the broad marketing strategy of your organization, highlighting the main features of your product or service that set you apart in the market. Micro differentiation, on the other hand, is the personal touch at a sales level, where the unique needs of each customer are addressed with customized solutions. </p><p>When wielded skillfully, sales professionals tailor their approach to address the specific desires and needs of each customer, transforming broad marketing claims into potent benefits. How&apos;s that for a true sales superpower?</p><p>Differentiation can be divided into working with hard and soft factors that your customer considers during their purchasing process, and it&apos;s important to acknowledge that both have a pivotal role in your sales cycle. </p><p>Hard factors are quantifiable and measurable attributes such as cost, functionality, or efficiency. They are like the concrete that forms the foundation of a house. You love dealing with them, don&apos;t you? High-energy, high-volume salespeople certainly do. They can rattle off spec sheets and cost comparisons, turning those numbers into convincing narratives and high revenue numbers. If your offering possesses a lot of these, you&apos;re likely to draw increasing amounts of revenue fast and with little effort.</p><p>However, outside of market leaders and even amongst them, sales teams must often focus on less tangible factors like customer experience, responsiveness, and personalized service resulting in more work across a variety of complex sales scenarios and longer sales cycles. To heighten the impact of soft factors, consider &quot;hardening&quot; them. This can be achieved by working with independent outside experts or inside specialists that can provide credibility and objectivity to the less tangible or concrete aspects of your offering. </p><p>On the flip side, instead of hardening, it&apos;s worth mentioning that sometimes in competitive situations it can be beneficial to &quot;soften&quot; criteria by focusing on overall benefits and unique selling propositions, rather than getting entangled in those pesky feature-by-feature comparisons.</p><p>This brings us to the art of conducting a vulnerability analysis. By examining how your prospective customer perceives your product relative to competition, you can anticipate potential challenges, arming yourself with the right counterarguments, and fortifying your position. This isn&apos;t about undermining your competitors, but about understanding the terrain you&apos;re navigating, helping your product stand out in its unique ways.</p><p>Conducting vulnerability analysis is an important step worth considering at the level of each individual customer case. It&apos;s easy to do and involves a deep-dive into how the client perceives your product in comparison to your competitors. Understanding these perceptions can guide your strategy, helping you address potential objections preemptively, highlighting your unique strengths, and avoiding unnecessary discussions around the strengths of your competitors.</p><div class="kg-card kg-callout-card kg-callout-card-blue"><div class="kg-callout-emoji">&#x1F4A1;</div><div class="kg-callout-text">Interested to learn more about conducting vulnerability analysis? Sign up for future posts below.</div></div><p></p><!--kg-card-begin: html--><div id="mc_embed_signup">
<form action="https://lostbookofsales.us16.list-manage.com/subscribe/post?u=b685f871ace40d4f27925e159&amp;id=cc2b1068a4" method="post" id="mc-embedded-subscribe-form" name="mc-embedded-subscribe-form" class="validate" target="_blank" novalidate>
    <div id="mc_embed_signup_scroll">
	
	<input type="email" value name="EMAIL" class="email" id="mce-EMAIL" placeholder="Enter your email" required>
    <!-- real people should not fill this in and expect good things - do not remove this or risk form bot signups-->
    <div style="position: absolute; left: -5000px;" aria-hidden="true"><input type="text" name="b_b685f871ace40d4f27925e159_cc2b1068a4" tabindex="-1" value></div>
    <input type="submit" value="Go &#x26A1;&#xFE0F;" name="subscribe" id="mc-embedded-subscribe" class="button">
    </div>
</form>
</div>
<br><!--kg-card-end: html--><p>Let&apos;s get a bit more practical before closing things off. </p><p>First, consider the concept of micro and macro differentiation. Imagine you are a sales professional for a software company that provides project management solutions. Your macro differentiation strategy, agreed at the marketing level, may emphasize that your software uses artificial intelligence to predict and prevent project delays. However, when selling to a specific customer, say a small software development company, you employ micro differentiation addressing their particular situation and discussing how your software could help track their coding sprints, streamline bug tracking, and foster better communication among their dispersed teams.</p><p>Now, let&apos;s explore the interplay between hard and soft factors using the same context. A hard factor would be the functionality of your software &#x2013; its ability to integrate with other tools, responsiveness, real-time progress tracking (quantifiable aspects). On the other hand, soft factors might involve your company&apos;s reputation for excellent customer service, the intuitiveness of the software, or even your ability to provide personalized, attentive service to the client.</p><p>Differentiation becomes potent enough when combined with hardening and softening of criteria. In its basic form, given that a prospective client is fixated on a hard criterion like price, you could soften this by highlighting the potential for your software to save them hours in project coordination time, which could more than compensate for the initial cost. On the contrary, if a customer is concerned about the user experience (a soft factor), you could harden this by sharing testimonials, expert reviews, or even quantitative data on user satisfaction rates.</p><p>As for the vulnerability analysis, consider another situation where your main competitor&apos;s software is less expensive and they are using this point to their advantage. To address this, you&apos;d need to understand your prospective customer&apos;s perception of your product and its value. If you find that the customer perceives your software as too expensive (and it&apos;s not an excuse for some other reason you haven&apos;t been informed about), you can go as far as to counteracting this by telling you&apos;ve had a more barebones lower-cost option available in the past which was cheaper than that of your competitor, but its ability to prevent project delays, and result in potential cost savings in terms of efficient project management was not all that high for what your clients were expecting, resulting in your current more advanced and consequently more expensive configuration you are offering today. </p><p>In such cases, based on objective knowledge of your own vulnerabilities, your understanding of your customer&apos;s perceptions at a given stage of their purchasing process, as well as your knowledge of the strategic interplay between micro and macro differentiation, hard and soft factors, and a thorough vulnerability analysis let you craft a more compelling, personalized, and effective sales strategy. It enables you to build stronger rapport with your clients, addressing their unique needs, and consequently, securing more sales.</p><p>In conclusion, your ability to distinguish between broad marketing messages (macro differentiation) and personalized selling points (micro differentiation) enables you to effectively respond to varied decision-making criteria of your customers. Understanding and working with these decision criteria, combined with a thorough vulnerability analysis, can significantly reduce your vulnerability and enhance your competitive position. Such an approach will ultimately help you establish stronger customer relationships, foster trust, and drive successful sales outcomes, especially if you manage to extend this understanding across your entire sales team. </p><p>As you navigate your sales journey, remember &#x2013; it&apos;s often the hard factors and relentless work that get you in the game, but it&apos;s often the soft factors and understanding of their interplay that help you win it. </p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Selling indirectly to decision makers]]></title><description><![CDATA[What can you do if you cannot gain access to decision makers? After identifying the focus of dissatisfaction, let's talk about how things typically turn out in the real world and what can we do about it. ]]></description><link>https://www.lostbookofsales.com/selling-indirectly-to-decision-makers/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">671116cdb5bcc265d735b6d9</guid><category><![CDATA[Sell 🤝]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Santeri]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2023 13:03:41 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2023/04/IMG_2447.JPG" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2023/04/IMG_2447.JPG" alt="Selling indirectly to decision makers"><p>Traditional sales doctrine tells us to always get face-to-face access to decision makers at all costs. However, I keep hearing that it&apos;s increasingly difficult to get in front of these &quot;centers of power&quot; in our modern-day busy marketplace. So what can we do? The answer is to leverage our internal champions at our customer&apos;s identified focus of dissatisfaction, so they can successfully keep selling the topic internally and push the process on our behalf. </p><p>As always, it&apos;s easier said than done. You may be familiar with a situation early in the sales cycle where after your prospect insisted, they took over and had a critical conversation or delivered your presentation in an absolutely butchered manner and zero effect. Bam, and your chance was gone. </p><p>In reality, we oftentimes don&apos;t have the chance to join our client&apos;s internal discussions in the first place. So it&apos;s critical for you to trust your internal sponsors and people you&apos;ve identified to actually have the pain you can solve. They are your internal champions who have understood the value of your solution and vouch for it internally on their end. </p><p>Therefore, a question comes up regarding how you can best prepare your client-side champion to make a convincing internal presentation? If you just list the topics and benefits of your solution, things will inevitably get omitted, filtered and watered down by the time they will be discussed. Oftentimes, no matter how hard your champions try, they won&apos;t be able to present your message as convincingly as you could &#x2013; and it&apos;s that kind of artificial flair with which the decision maker will be informed about it too. </p><p>What you need to do instead is to rehearse and coach your champions. It sounds difficult to put in practice, but asking and probing for the impact and value your product provides to their organization, they&apos;ll be able to dress your impact and value into their own convincing words and talking points. We as the seller want to essentially shift our sponsor&apos;s mind into that future state where the problem we&apos;ve identified is already tackled and where the implications, and the payoff of our solution is already far into improving their organization. What is the impact it is having? What have we mitigated or improved? On the other hand, what will happen if their problem remains unsolved?</p><p>This way sponsors themselves can craft the exact details of your common message according to their own liking and a way that works best for them, and consequently, for you. It&apos;s because they understand clearly the value and purpose of bringing your product on board and into their organization&apos;s further consideration. Coaching your sponsors with &quot;Implication&quot; and &quot;Need-payoff&quot; questions familiar to us from Rackham&apos;s SPIN framework, will help you frame and probe for the understanding of your product and its impact by your champions. </p><div class="kg-card kg-callout-card kg-callout-card-grey"><div class="kg-callout-emoji">&#x1F4A1;</div><div class="kg-callout-text">I will be writing more about SPIN in the future, so if you&apos;d like to be notified, please subscribe to my handcrafted LBS newsletter I might occasionally send right into your inbox.</div></div><p></p><p>This way your sponsors are ready to go and present your solution internally. They&apos;ll do it in a convincing and effective manner so that maybe &#x2013; next time &#x2013; you&apos;ll have a true chance to be invited and join the conversation while gaining valuable access to the right decision makers and budget holders of your client organization. </p><p>Soon already, with a better chance you&apos;ll be well on your way to proceed in your customer&apos;s complex b-to-b buying process. Good luck!</p><p><em>Disclaimer: I&apos;m not affiliated with SPIN or Neil Rackham in any way. Only some limited Amazon affilitate links are used on this site.</em></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Stoicism from the ground up]]></title><description><![CDATA[Inspired by Ryan Holiday's collection of Stoic quotes in his book: The Daily Stoic, I thought to re-package my favorite bits into this post for you to enjoy and learn.]]></description><link>https://www.lostbookofsales.com/stoicism-from-the-ground-up/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">671116cdb5bcc265d735b6d8</guid><category><![CDATA[Thrive 🌱]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Santeri]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2022 19:38:27 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2022/04/f_lbs_lake_finland.jpeg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2022/04/f_lbs_lake_finland.jpeg" alt="Stoicism from the ground up"><p>A lot of the text is almost directly cited from Holiday&apos;s collection so if you find it interesting I recommend you to check out the book on Amazon or elsewhere. </p><p>The post consists of three sections: </p><ol><li>An Introduction</li><li>A collection of my favorite stoic quotes</li><li>On getting busy with your life&apos;s purpose</li></ol><p>If you like this post, learn about additional principles of <a href="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/8-principles-to-help-you-stay-mentally-balanced-and-happy/">staying blanced and happy</a>, read one of my best book reviews, the <a href="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/notes/the-denial-of-death-by-ernest-becker/">Denial of Death</a> by Ernest Becker, or dive into Naval&apos;s <a href="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/notes/the-denial-of-death-by-ernest-becker/">summarized wisdom</a>. I&apos;m sure you won&apos;t be disappointed.</p><h2 id="introduction">Introduction</h2><p>The philosophy asserts that virtue (meaning, chiefly, the four cardinal virtues of self-control, courage, justice, and wisdom) is happiness, and it is our perception of things &#x2014; rather than the things themselves &#x2014; that cause most of our trouble.</p><p>Stoicism teaches that we can&#x2019;t control or rely on anything outside what Epictetus called our &#x201C;reasoned choice&#x201D; &#x2014; our ability to use our reason to choose how we categorize, respond, and reorient ourselves to external events.</p><p>The Stoics all held vastly different stations in life. Some were rich, some were born at the bottom of Rome&#x2019;s rigid hierarchy. Some had it easy, and others had it unimaginably hard. This is true for us as well &#x2014; we all come to philosophy from different backgrounds, and even within our own lives we experience bouts of good fortune and bad fortune. But in all circumstances &#x2014; adversity or advantage &#x2014; we really have just one thing we need to do: focus on what is in our control as opposed to what is not. </p><p>Right now we might be laid low with struggles, whereas just a few years ago we might have lived high on the hog, and in just a few days we might be doing so well that success is actually a burden. One thing will stay constant: our freedom of choice &#x2014; both in the big picture and small picture. Ultimately, this is clarity. </p><p>Whoever we are, wherever we are&#x2014;what matters is our choices. What are they? How will we evaluate them? How will we make the most of them? Those are the questions life asks us, regardless of our station. How will you answer?</p><hr><p>These weren&#x2019;t abstract questions. In their writings &#x2014; often private letters or diaries &#x2014; and in their lectures, the Stoics struggled to come up with real, actionable answers. They ultimately framed their work around a series of exercises in three critical disciplines: </p><ol><li>The Discipline of Perception (how we see and perceive the world around us) </li><li>The Discipline of Action (the decisions and actions we take&#x2014;and to what end) </li><li>The Discipline of Will (how we deal with the things we cannot change, attain clear and convincing judgment, and come to a true understanding of our place in the world) </li></ol><p>By controlling our perceptions, the Stoics tell us, we can find mental clarity. In directing our actions properly and justly, we&#x2019;ll be effective. In utilizing and aligning our will, we will find the wisdom and perspective to deal with anything the world puts before us.</p><p>A well-known writer once complained that after becoming successful, wealthy friends were always inviting him to their beautiful, exotic houses. &#x201C;Come to our home in the south of France,&#x201D; they would say. Or, &#x201C;Our Swiss ski chalet is a wonderful place to write.&#x201D; The writer traveled the world, living in luxury, hoping to find inspiration and creativity in these inspiring manors and mansions. Yet it rarely happened. There was always the allure of another, better house. There were always distractions, always so many things to do &#x2014; and the writer&#x2019;s block and insecurity that plagues creative types traveled with him wherever he went. </p><p>We tell ourselves that we need the right setup before we finally buckle down and get serious. Or we tell ourselves that some vacation or time alone will be good for a relationship or an ailment. This is self-deceit at its finest. It&#x2019;s far better that we become pragmatic and adaptable &#x2014; able to do what we need to do anywhere, anytime. The place to do your work, to live the good life, is here.</p><p>That self-assurance is yours to claim as well. No matter what happens today, no matter where you find yourself, shift to what lies within your reasoned choices. Ignore, as best you can, the emotions that pop up, which would be so easy to distract yourself with. Don&#x2019;t get emotional &#x2014; get focused.</p><hr><p>The Stoics were mercifully spared the information overload endemic to today&#x2019;s society. They had no social media, no newspapers, no television chatter to rile them up. But even back then, an undisciplined person would have found plenty to be distracted and upset by. </p><p>Part of the Stoic mindset then was a sort of a cultivated ignorance. Publilius Syrus&#x2019;s epigram expresses it well: &#x201C;Always shun that which makes you angry.&#x201D; Meaning: turn your mind away from the things that provoke it. </p><p>If you find that discussing politics at the dinner table leads to fighting, why do you keep bringing it up? If your sibling&#x2019;s life choices bother you, why don&#x2019;t you stop picking at them and making them your concern? The same goes for so many other sources of aggravation. </p><p>It&#x2019;s not a sign of weakness to shut them out. Instead, it&#x2019;s a sign of strong will. Try saying: &#x201C;I know the reaction I typically take in these situations, and I&#x2019;m not going to do it this time.&#x201D; And then follow it with: &#x201C;I&#x2019;m also going to remove this stimulus from my life in the future as well.&#x201D; Because what follows is peace and serenity.</p><p>The Stoics were pioneers of the morning and nightly rituals: preparation in the morning, reflection in the evening. Looking at the beautiful expanse of the sky is an antidote to the nagging pettiness of earthly concerns. And it is good and sobering to lose yourself in that as often as you can.</p><h2 id="timeless-quotes">Timeless quotes</h2><p>&#x201C;The chief task in life is simply this: to identify and separate matters so that I can say clearly to myself which are externals not under my control, and which have to do with the choices I actually control. Where then do I look for good and evil? Not to uncontrollable externals, but within myself to the choices that are my own&#x2026;&#x201D; Epictetus, Discourses</p><p>&#x201C;The proper work of the mind is the exercise of choice, refusal, yearning, repulsion, preparation, purpose, and assent. What then can pollute and clog the mind&#x2019;s proper functioning? Nothing but its own corrupt decisions.&#x201D; Epictetus, Discourses</p><p>&#x201C;So in the majority of other things, we address circumstances not in accordance with the right assumptions, but mostly by following wretched habit. Since all that I&#x2019;ve said is the case, the person in training must seek to rise above, so as to stop seeking out pleasure and steering away from pain; to stop clinging to living and abhorring death; and in the case of property and money, to stop valuing receiving over giving.&#x201D; Musonius Rufus, Lectures</p><p>&#x201C;How many have laid waste to your life when you weren&#x2019;t aware of what you were losing, how much was wasted in pointless grief, foolish joy, greedy desire, and social amusements &#x2014; how little of your own was left to you. You will realize you are dying before your time!&#x201D; Seneca, On the brevity of life</p><p>&#x201C;The diseases of the rational soul are long-standing and hardened vices, such as greed and ambition &#x2014; they have put the soul in a straitjacket and have begun to be permanent evils inside it. To put it briefly, this sickness is an unrelenting distortion of judgment, so things that are only mildly desirable are vigorously sought after.&#x201D; Seneca, Moral letters</p><p>&#x201C;Don&#x2019;t act grudgingly, selfishly, without due diligence, or to be a contrarian. Don&#x2019;t overdress your thought in fine language. Don&#x2019;t be a person of too many words and too many deeds&#x2026; Be cheerful, not wanting outside help or the relief others might bring. A person needs to stand on their own, not be propped up.&#x201D; Marcus Aurelius, Meditations</p><p>&#x201C;When you see someone often flashing their rank or position, or someone whose name is often bandied about in public, don&#x2019;t be envious; such things are bought at the expense of life&#x2026; Some die on the first rungs of the ladder of success, others before they can reach the top, and the few that make it to the top of their ambition through a thousand indignities realize at the end it&#x2019;s only for an inscription on their gravestone.&#x201D; Seneca, On the brevity of life</p><p>&#x201C;Let&#x2019;s pass over to the really rich&#x2014;how often the occasions they look just like the poor! When they travel abroad they must restrict their baggage, and when haste is necessary, they dismiss their entourage. And those who are in the army, how few of their possessions they get to keep&#x2026;&#x201D; Seneca, On consolation to Helvia</p><p>&#x201C;If you wish to improve, be content to appear clueless or stupid in extraneous matters &#x2014; don&#x2019;t wish to seem knowledgeable. And if some regard you as important, distrust yourself.&#x201D; Epictetus, Enchiridion</p><p>&#x201C;Indeed, if you find anything in human life better than justice, truth, self-control, courage &#x2014; in short, anything better than the sufficiency of your own mind, which keeps you acting according to the demands of true reason and accepting what fate gives you outside of your own power of choice &#x2014; I tell you, if you can see anything better than this, turn to it heart and soul and take full advantage of this greater good you&#x2019;ve found.&#x201D; Marcus Aurelius, Meditations</p><p>&#x201C;Trust me, real joy is a serious thing. Do you think someone can, in the charming expression, blithely dismiss death with an easy disposition? Or swing open the door to poverty, keep pleasures in check, or meditate on the endurance of suffering? The one who is comfortable with turning these thoughts over is truly full of joy, but hardly cheerful. It&#x2019;s exactly such a joy that I would wish for you to possess, for it will never run dry once you&#x2019;ve laid claim to its source.&#x201D; Seneca, Moral letters</p><p>&#x201C;How disgraceful is the lawyer whose dying breath passes while at court, at an advanced age, pleading for unknown litigants and still seeking the approval of ignorant spectators.&#x201D; Seneca, On the brevity of life</p><p>&#x201C;At this moment you aren&#x2019;t on a journey, but wandering about, being driven from place to place, even though what you seek &#x2014; to live well &#x2014; is found in all places. Is there any place more full of confusion than the Forum? Yet even there you can live at peace, if needed.&#x201D; Seneca, Moral letters</p><p>&#x201C;Silence is a lesson learned from the many sufferings of life.&#x201D; Seneca, Thyestes</p><p>&#x201C;It&#x2019;s ruinous for the soul to be anxious about the future and miserable in advance of misery, engulfed by anxiety that the things it desires might remain its own until the very end. For such a soul will never be at rest &#x2014; by longing for things to come it will lose the ability to enjoy present things.&#x201D; Seneca, Moral letters</p><p>&#x201C;Won&#x2019;t you be walking in your predecessors&#x2019; footsteps? I surely will use the older path, but if I find a shorter and smoother way, I&#x2019;ll blaze a trail there. The ones who pioneered these paths aren&#x2019;t our masters, but our guides. Truth stands open to everyone, it hasn&#x2019;t been monopolized.&#x201D; Seneca, Moral letters</p><p>&#x201C;Heraclitus would shed tears whenever he went out in public &#x2014; Democritus laughed. One saw the whole as a parade of miseries, the other of follies. And so, we should take a lighter view of things and bear them with an easy spirit, for it is more human to laugh at life than to lament it.&#x201D; Seneca, On tranquility of mind</p><p>&#x201C;The founder of the universe, who assigned to us the laws of life, provided that we should live well, but not in luxury. Everything needed for our well-being is right before us, whereas what luxury requires is gathered by many miseries and anxieties. Let us use this gift of nature and count it among the greatest things.&#x201D; Seneca, Moral letters</p><p>&#x201C;I judge you unfortunate because you have never lived through misfortune. You have passed through life without an opponent &#x2014; no one can ever know what you are capable of, not even you.&#x201D; Seneca, On providence</p><p>&#x201C;Consider who you are. Above all, a human being, carrying no greater power than your own reasoned choice, which oversees all other things, and is free from any other master.&#x201D; Epictetus, discourses</p><p>&#x201C;Try praying differently, and see what happens: Instead of asking for &#x2018;a way to sleep with her,&#x2019; try asking for &#x2018;a way to stop desiring to sleep with her.&#x2019; Instead of &#x2018;a way to get rid of him,&#x2019; try asking for &#x2018;a way to not crave his demise.&#x2019; Instead of &#x2018;a way to not lose my child,&#x2019; try asking for &#x2018;a way to lose my fear of it.&#x2019;&#x201D; Marcus Aurelius, Meditations</p><p>&#x201C;Leisure without study is death &#x2014; a tomb for the living person.&#x201D; Seneca, Moral letters</p><p>&#x201C;But the wise person can lose nothing. Such a person has everything stored up for themselves, leaving nothing to fortune, their own goods are held firm, bound in virtue, which requires nothing from chance, and therefore can&#x2019;t be either increased or diminished. Seneca, On the firmness of the wise</p><p>&#x201C;Keep constant guard over your perceptions, for it is no small thing you are protecting, but your respect, trustworthiness and steadiness, peace of mind, freedom from pain and fear, in a word your freedom. For what would you sell these things?&#x201D; Epictetus, Discourses</p><p>&#x201C;This is the true athlete &#x2014; the person in rigorous training against false impressions. Remain firm, you who suffer, don&#x2019;t be kidnapped by your impressions! The struggle is great, the task divine &#x2014; to gain mastery, freedom, happiness, and tranquility.&#x201D; Epictetus, Discourses</p><p>&#x201C;Meditate often on the interconnectedness and mutual interdependence of all things in the universe. For in a sense, all things are mutually woven together and therefore have an affinity for each other &#x2014; for one thing follows after another according to their tension of movement, their sympathetic stirrings, and the unity of all substance.&#x201D; Marcus Aurelius, Meditations</p><p>&#x201C;Since habit is such a powerful influence, and we&#x2019;re used to pursuing our impulses to gain and avoid outside our own choice, we should set a contrary habit against that, and where appearances are really slippery, use the counterforce of our training.&#x201D; Epictetus, Discourses</p><p>&#x201C;You have proof in the extent of your wanderings that you never found the art of living anywhere &#x2014; not in logic, nor in wealth, fame, or in any indulgence. Nowhere. Where is it then? In doing what human nature demands. How is a person to do this? By having principles be the source of desire and action. What principles? Those to do with good and evil, indeed in the belief that there is no good for a human being except what creates justice, self-control, courage and freedom, and nothing evil except what destroys these things.&#x201D; Marcus Aurelius, Meditations</p><p>&#x201C;Don&#x2019;t trust in your reputation, money, or position, but in the strength that is yours &#x2014; namely, your judgments about the things that you control and don&#x2019;t control. For this alone is what makes us free and unfettered, that picks us up by the neck from the depths and lifts us eye to eye with the rich and powerful.&#x201D; Epictetus, Discourses</p><p>&#x201C;Hecato says, &#x2018;cease to hope and you will cease to fear.&#x2019; ... The primary cause of both these ills is that instead of adapting ourselves to present circumstances we send out thoughts too far ahead.&#x201D; Seneca, Moral letters</p><p>&#x201C;Our rational nature moves freely forward in its impressions when it: 1) accepts nothing false or uncertain; 2) directs its impulses only to acts for the common good; 3) limits its desires and aversions only to what&#x2019;s in its own power; 4) embraces everything nature assigns it.&#x201D; Marcus Aurelius, Meditations</p><p>&#x201C;We are like many pellets of incense falling on the same altar. Some collapse sooner, others later, but it makes no difference.&#x201D; Marcus Aurelius, Meditations</p><p>&#x201C;How satisfying it is to dismiss and block out any upsetting or foreign impression, and immediately to have peace in all things.&#x201D; Marcus Aurelius, Meditations</p><p>&#x201C;You know what wine and liqueur tastes like. It makes no difference whether a hundred or a thousand bottles pass through your bladder &#x2014; you are nothing more than a filter.&#x201D; Seneca, Moral letters</p><p>&#x201C;All you need are these: certainty of judgment in the present moment; action for the common good in the present moment; and an attitude of gratitude in the present moment for anything that comes your way.&#x201D; Marcus Aurelius, Meditations</p><p>&#x201C;The mind must be given relaxation &#x2014; it will rise improved and sharper after a good break. Just as rich fields must not be forced &#x2014; for they will quickly lose their fertility if never given a break &#x2014; so constant work on the anvil will fracture the force of the mind. But it regains its powers if it is set free and relaxed for a while. Constant work gives rise to a certain kind of dullness and feebleness in the rational soul.&#x201D; Seneca, On tranquility of mind</p><p>&#x201C;What is the fruit of these teachings? Only the most beautiful and proper harvest of the truly educated &#x2014; tranquility, fearlessness, and freedom. We should not trust the masses who say only the free can be educated, but rather the lovers of wisdom who say that only the educated are free.&#x201D; Epictetus, Discourses</p><p>&#x201C;I will keep constant watch over myself and &#x2014; most usefully &#x2014; will put each day up for review. For this is what makes us evil &#x2014; that none of us looks back upon our own lives. We reflect upon only that which we are about to do. And yet our plans for the future descend from the past.&#x201D; Seneca, Moral letters</p><p>&#x201C;If someone asks you how to write your name, would you bark out each letter? And if they get angry, would you then return the anger? Wouldn&#x2019;t you rather gently spell out each letter for them? So then, remember in life that your duties are the sum of individual acts. Pay attention to each of these as you do your duty&#x2026; just methodically complete your task.&#x201D; Marcus Aurelius, Meditations</p><p>&#x201C;It&#x2019;s not at all that we have too short a time to live, but that we squander a great deal of it. Life is long enough, and it&#x2019;s given in sufficient measure to do many great things if we spend it well. But when it&#x2019;s poured down the drain of luxury and neglect, when it&#x2019;s employed to no good end, we&#x2019;re finally driven to see that it has passed by before we even recognized it passing. And so it is &#x2014; we don&#x2019;t receive a short life, we make it so.&#x201D; Seneca, On the brevity of life</p><p>&#x201C;Pass through this brief patch of time in harmony with nature, and come to your final resting place gracefully, just as a ripened olive might drop, praising the earth that nourished it and grateful to the tree that gave it growth.&#x201D; Marcus Aurelius, Meditations</p><h2 id="on-getting-busy-with-your-lifes-purpose">On getting busy with your life&apos;s purpose</h2><p>&#x201C;Stop wandering about! You aren&#x2019;t likely to read your own notebooks, or ancient histories, or the anthologies you&#x2019;ve collected to enjoy in your old age. Get busy with life&#x2019;s purpose, toss aside empty hopes, get active in your own rescue &#x2014; if you care for yourself at all &#x2014; and do it while you can.&#x201D; Marcus Aurelius, Meditations</p><p><em>For more content like this, consider subscribing to the occasional hand-made LBS newsletter, see you around!</em></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Confidence]]></title><description><![CDATA[After watching Daniel Craig's last Bond film 'No Time to Die', walking out of the theater I got an idea to share my notes on how to emit confident behavior à la 007. It's short and sweet, enjoy!]]></description><link>https://www.lostbookofsales.com/confidence/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">671116cdb5bcc265d735b6d7</guid><category><![CDATA[Thrive 🌱]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Santeri]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2022 15:20:06 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2022/02/lbs-bond-cover.jpeg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2 id="5-1-ways-to-emit-confidence">5 + 1 ways to emit confidence</h2><img src="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2022/02/lbs-bond-cover.jpeg" alt="Confidence"><p>This movie was some top-class entertainment by the way, a strong recommendation. So, let&apos;s get down to business. This will help you seem confident, trustworthy and professional. Hint, don&apos;t take this all too seriously.</p><h3 id="1-relaxed-body-language">1. Relaxed body language</h3><p><strong>WHY:</strong> It helps other people feel relaxed too and builds up your confidence.</p><p><strong>HOW: </strong>Spread yourself out comfortably. Move yourself freely. Have eye contact on special occasions.</p><figure class="kg-card kg-image-card kg-card-hascaption"><img src="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2022/02/bond-body-language-lbs.jpeg" class="kg-image" alt="Confidence" loading="lazy" width="1125" height="633" srcset="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/size/w600/2022/02/bond-body-language-lbs.jpeg 600w, https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/size/w1000/2022/02/bond-body-language-lbs.jpeg 1000w, https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2022/02/bond-body-language-lbs.jpeg 1125w" sizes="(min-width: 720px) 720px"><figcaption>There are some funny scenes.</figcaption></figure><h3 id="2-be-non-reactive">2. Be non-reactive</h3><p><strong>WHY:</strong> If you are non-reactive it shows you are not pressured by what&#x2019;s happening around you and have all the control.</p><p><strong>HOW:</strong> Simply don&#x2019;t react, stay silent under pressure. Pause and breathe.</p><figure class="kg-card kg-image-card kg-card-hascaption"><img src="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2022/02/bond-lbs-sit-1.png" class="kg-image" alt="Confidence" loading="lazy" width="1000" height="672" srcset="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/size/w600/2022/02/bond-lbs-sit-1.png 600w, https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2022/02/bond-lbs-sit-1.png 1000w" sizes="(min-width: 720px) 720px"><figcaption>This guy is not really intimidated by anything, now is he?</figcaption></figure><h3 id="3-dont-try-to-convince-other-people">3. Don&apos;t try to convince other people</h3><p><strong>WHY:</strong> It helps you be persuasive.</p><p><strong>HOW:</strong> Frame yourself as an equal partner, be willing to walk away.</p><figure class="kg-card kg-image-card kg-card-hascaption"><img src="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2022/02/bond-talking-2-lbs-2.jpg" class="kg-image" alt="Confidence" loading="lazy" width="1200" height="757" srcset="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/size/w600/2022/02/bond-talking-2-lbs-2.jpg 600w, https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/size/w1000/2022/02/bond-talking-2-lbs-2.jpg 1000w, https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2022/02/bond-talking-2-lbs-2.jpg 1200w" sizes="(min-width: 720px) 720px"><figcaption>Love&apos;s a tough thing you know...</figcaption></figure><h3 id="4-signal-good-health">4. Signal good health</h3><p><strong>WHY: </strong>Healthy body carries a healthy mind.</p><p><strong>HOW: </strong>Keep your back straight, posture upright and radiate positive energy. Try to smile.</p><figure class="kg-card kg-image-card kg-card-hascaption"><img src="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2022/02/bond-stepping-out-lbs.jpeg" class="kg-image" alt="Confidence" loading="lazy" width="640" height="448" srcset="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/size/w600/2022/02/bond-stepping-out-lbs.jpeg 600w, https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2022/02/bond-stepping-out-lbs.jpeg 640w"><figcaption>Now Daniel doesn&apos;t really smile a lot in the movie, but you should!</figcaption></figure><h3 id="5-believe-that-you-will-be-ok">5. Believe that you will be ok</h3><p><strong>WHY: </strong>This helps you tell the truth. You&apos;ll stop worrying about rejection and will never be weak.</p><p><strong>HOW: </strong>Live it and be practical.</p><figure class="kg-card kg-image-card kg-card-hascaption"><img src="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2022/02/lbs-bond-view.png" class="kg-image" alt="Confidence" loading="lazy" width="1100" height="670" srcset="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/size/w600/2022/02/lbs-bond-view.png 600w, https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/size/w1000/2022/02/lbs-bond-view.png 1000w, https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2022/02/lbs-bond-view.png 1100w" sizes="(min-width: 720px) 720px"><figcaption>The man, the legend.</figcaption></figure><h3 id="6-bonus-help-your-clients-believe-in-you">6. Bonus: Help your clients believe in you</h3><p><strong>WHY: </strong>How much would you trust being on a plane with a first-time pilot? What about being on a table of a first-time brain surgeon?</p><p><strong>HOW:</strong> Emit competence. Make decisions swiftly and act firmly. Don&#x2019;t hesitate. </p><figure class="kg-card kg-image-card kg-card-hascaption"><img src="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2022/02/daniel-bond-lbs-talking.jpeg" class="kg-image" alt="Confidence" loading="lazy" width="640" height="360" srcset="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/size/w600/2022/02/daniel-bond-lbs-talking.jpeg 600w, https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2022/02/daniel-bond-lbs-talking.jpeg 640w"><figcaption>Daniel talking his talks...</figcaption></figure><h3 id="a-word-on-competencee">A word on competencee</h3><p>In business, your ability to project competence is essential to win over new customers and keep your existing ones. People will look closely to your actions for assessing your integrity, skills, and trustworthiness.</p><p>Everything you do, such as the way you react in certain situations, says a lot about who you are as a business owner. It has often been said that actions speak louder than words, and you&apos;ll &quot;find more success&quot; if you can show who you are by some good habits, manners and graces.</p><h3 id="download">Download</h3><p>Feel free to grab the <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WHk_gpBiZDhWVPxthJFB18g3Cn5QJqf0P8YSt7yhtLg/edit?usp=sharing">plain text version of this checklist</a>. </p><figure class="kg-card kg-bookmark-card"><a class="kg-bookmark-container" href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WHk_gpBiZDhWVPxthJFB18g3Cn5QJqf0P8YSt7yhtLg/edit?usp=sharing"><div class="kg-bookmark-content"><div class="kg-bookmark-title">Confidence (LBS)</div><div class="kg-bookmark-description">Confidence This helps you focus on how to seem confident, trustworthy and professional. Principles These are some basic principles to glance over and implement, especially in stressful situations. Else you might seem panicky and lost. 1. Relaxed body language WHY: It helps other people feel ...</div><div class="kg-bookmark-metadata"><img class="kg-bookmark-icon" src="https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/documents/images/kix-favicon7.ico" alt="Confidence"><span class="kg-bookmark-author">Google Docs</span></div></div><div class="kg-bookmark-thumbnail"><img src="https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/QPgRPnL0cii5QkqV4AmMigVxx7qfV4miHen-IiDQKO_XGVClWwM69lsLhTvy9vwK1ewzr5zMvkE79g=w1200-h630-p" alt="Confidence"></div></a></figure><hr><p><em>Let me know if you liked this kind of a post for once. I&apos;m sizzling with ideas... Anyhow, feel free to leave a comment below, see you around!</em></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Art of Action by Stephen Bungay]]></title><description><![CDATA[Rating: 8/10. How leaders close gaps between plans, actions and results. This book is about Bungay's expertful research into military's learnings from past centuries and how it all can be applied to modern-day business and leadership. Find an extensive summary below.]]></description><link>https://www.lostbookofsales.com/notes/book-summary-art-of-action-by-stephen-bungay/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">671116cdb5bcc265d735b6d2</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Santeri]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2021 10:08:10 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rating 8/10</strong></p><!--kg-card-begin: markdown--><p>See book on <a target="_blank" href="https://amzn.to/3z1WhIA">Amazon</a>.</p>
<!--kg-card-end: markdown--><!--kg-card-begin: markdown--><img src="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2021/12/bungay-art-of-action-lbs.jpg" alt="Art of Action book cover on the LBS website" width="45%"><!--kg-card-end: markdown--><h2 id="summary-table-of-contents">Summary table of contents</h2><p>Click on a link to jump over to a desired section.</p><p><strong>Introduction</strong></p><!--kg-card-begin: html--><ul>
    <li>
     <a href="#my-brief-thoughts-from-reading-the-book">Brief thoughts from reading this book</a>
    </li>
</ul><!--kg-card-end: html--><p><strong>Part 1: Uncertainty leading to organizational complexity</strong></p><!--kg-card-begin: html--><ul>
    <li>
     <a href="#execution-versus-mere-activity">Execution versus mere activity</a>
    </li>
    <li>
     <a href="#predictable-versus-an-unpredictable-environment">Predictable versus an unpredictable environment</a>
    </li>
    <li>
     <a href="#three-principles-for-ensuring-alignment">Three principles for ensuring alignment</a>
    </li>
</ul><!--kg-card-end: html--><p><strong>Part 2: Why look for inspiration from military history?</strong></p><!--kg-card-begin: html--><ul>
    <li>
     <a href="#the-concept-of-friction-and-its-application-to-business">The concept of friction and its application to business</a>
    </li>
    <li>
     <a href="#friction-and-the-three-gaps">Friction and the three gaps</a>
    </li>
    <li>
     <a href="#sources-of-friction">Sources of friction</a>
    </li>
    <li>
     <a href="#importance-of-clarity">Importance of clarity</a>
    </li>
</ul><!--kg-card-end: html--><p><strong>Part 3: Leadership with &#x201C;Auftragstaktik&quot;</strong></p><!--kg-card-begin: html--><ul>
    <li>
     <a href="#chain-of-command">Chain of command</a>
    </li>
    <li>
     <a href="#addressing-the-three-gaps-with-auftragstaktik">Addressing the three gaps with Auftragstaktik</a>
    </li>
    <li>
     <a href="#bi-directional-information-flow">Bi-directional information flow</a>
    </li>
    <li>
     <a href="#autonomy-and-alignment">Autonomy and alignment</a>
    </li>
    
    <li>
     <a href="#resulting-adaptability-and-self-reliance">Resulting adaptability and self-reliance</a>
    </li>
</ul><!--kg-card-end: html--><p><strong>Part 4: A short history tour of Auftragstaktik</strong></p><!--kg-card-begin: html--><ul>
    <li>
     <a href="#german-army-success-in-the-beginning-of-ww2">German army success in the beginning of WW2</a>
    </li>
    <li>
     <a href="#failure-of-the-auftragstaktik-towards-the-end-of-ww2">Failure of the Auftragstaktik towards the end of WW2</a>
    </li>
    <li>
        <a href="#from-auftragstaktik-to-mission-command">From Auftragstaktik to mission command</a>
    </li>
</ul><!--kg-card-end: html--><p><strong>Part 5: Back to the world of business</strong></p><!--kg-card-begin: html--><ul>
    <li>
     <a href="#from-mission-command-to-what-bungay-calls-%E2%80%9Cdirected-opportunism%E2%80%9D">From mission command to what Bungay calls &#x201C;directed opportunism&#x201D;</a>
    </li>
    <li>
     <a href="#the-role-of-strategy">The role of strategy</a>
    </li>
    <li>
     <a href="#strategy-under-uncertainty">Strategy under uncertainty</a>
    </li>
    <li>
     <a href="#strategy-and-operations">Strategy and operations</a>
    </li>
    <li>
     <a href="#developing-strategy">Developing strategy</a>
    </li>
    <li>
     <a href="#summary-on-strategy">Summary on strategy</a>
    </li>
</ul><!--kg-card-end: html--><p><strong>Part 6: Execution</strong></p><!--kg-card-begin: html--><ul>
    <li>
     <a href="#strategy-briefing-and-backbriefing">Strategy briefing and backbriefing</a>
    </li>
    <li>
     <a href="#recap-of-briefing-and-backbriefing">Recap of briefing and backbriefing</a>
    </li>
</ul><!--kg-card-end: html--><p><strong>Part 7: Building the organization</strong></p><!--kg-card-begin: html--><ul>
    <li>
     <a href="#hiring-the-right-people">Hiring the right people</a>
    </li>
    <li>
     <a href="#developing-people">Developing people</a>
    </li>
    <li>
     <a href="#drivers-of-behavior">Drivers of behavior</a>
    </li>
</ul><!--kg-card-end: html--><p><strong>Part 8: Strategy, operations and tactics</strong></p><!--kg-card-begin: html--><ul>
    <li>
     <a href="#leading-and-managing">Leading and managing</a>
    </li>
</ul><!--kg-card-end: html--><p><strong>Conclusion</strong></p><!--kg-card-begin: html--><ul>
    <li>
     <a href="#conclusion">Concluding wrap up</a>
    </li>
</ul><!--kg-card-end: html--><h2 id="introduction">Introduction</h2><p>Welcome to the best summary of the book you&apos;ll find online. Here Bungay studies and applies historical military principles of leadership, strategy and management to challenges of modern organizations in an eye-opening way.</p><p>Just like the book itself, the summary can feel quite expansive at times, so feel free to use the table of contents as a way to skim through the content. However, if you take the time and effort to study the book more closely, I guarantee it will pay dividends across your whole professional life.</p><p>Majority of the text below is cited directly, and that is why I highly recommend you read the full book.</p><h3 id="my-brief-thoughts-from-reading-the-book">My brief thoughts from reading the book</h3><p>You&apos;re guaranteed to have a lot of &quot;a-ha!&quot; moments as you read, but the main thesis of the book boils down to a controversial perspective when applied to the modern day, which I&apos;ve personally found to be rather unpopular among the vast majority of people.</p><p>Many think that military principles and learnings should not have any bearing whatsoever on our civil lives, nor the management of contemporary organizations.<em>&quot;We are past this way of leading...&quot;</em> they say, and <em>&quot;You cannot manage today&apos;s people in this manner...&quot;</em> keeps getting claimed by people whom I&apos;ve talked with.</p><p>So in essence, this book is the best effort so far that I&#x2019;ve found to help correct the misunderstandings of what leadership under factors of uncertainty is truly about, and where the competitive pressures of &quot;opposing wills&quot; play out on a constant basis. Stephen explains excellently why these military principles are an effective way to think of the right ways to lead, also laying out well the core reasons of why you should care about any of this in the first place.</p><p>Meanwhile, I know that principles of Auftragstaktik and &quot;mission command&quot; are used for example by the Finnish military, where I took a year practicing these topics, as well as these principles having their place in the modern-day official NATO doctrine.</p><p>Finally, this book makes a strong case for hiring people not only through a rigorous selection process and developing them thereafter as one of the core aims of an organization, but makes a point for giving them autonomy and making the intent of your organization clear, this way unlocking the full potential of your company. Your organization should ideally serve as a platform for gifted, talented and ambitious people to build their, and consecutively your success in a sustainable and ongoing manner, as it all eventually comes down to people with whom you work being the exponential value driver for your organization. </p><h2 id="part-1-uncertainty-leads-to-organization-complexity">Part 1: Uncertainty leads to organization complexity</h2><p>Organizations operate in a complex and uncertain environment. Trying to cope with complexity, organizations grow complex as well. Things become opaque, creating internal uncertainty that adds up to the uncertainty on the outside. Faced with uncertainty, people search for more information; faced with complexity, they do more analysis. </p><p>Meetings proliferate and decisions are delayed. People on the front lines become frustrated at the lack of the decisions they need someone to make, and people at the top become frustrated at the apparent lack of action, although the level of activity is high. </p><p>More initiatives are launched, increasing the level of activity. The psychological effect is increased confusion. There is lots to do, but what will have the greatest effect and who should do it? </p><p>Accountability becomes more diffuse, so controls proliferate. This slows things down and restricts the scope for front-line decision making. Attempting to increase clarity, actions are specified in more detail. The emotional effect is an increase in cynicism and frustration. </p><p>Trust erodes. The cycle is toxic.</p><h3 id="execution-versus-mere-activity">Execution versus mere activity</h3><p>Generating activity is not a problem; in fact, it is easy. The fact that it is easy makes the real problem harder to solve. The problem is getting the right things done, namely the things that matter, the things that will have an impact, the things a company is trying to achieve to ensure success. </p><p>A high volume of activity often disguises a lack of effective action. We can mistake quantity for quality and then add to it, which merely makes things worse.</p><p>At its most simple, executing strategy is about planning what to do to achieve certain outcomes and making sure that the actions we have planned are carried out until the desired outcomes are achieved.</p><h3 id="predictable-versus-an-unpredictable-environment">Predictable versus an unpredictable environment</h3><p>In a stable and predictable environment, it is possible to make quite good plans by gathering and analyzing information. We can learn enough about the outside world and our position in it to set some objectives. </p><p>We know enough about the effects any actions will have to be able to work out what to do to achieve the objectives. We can then use a mixture of supervision, controls, and incentives to coerce, persuade, or cajole people into doing what we want. We can measure the results until the outcomes we want are achieved. </p><p>We can make plans, take actions, and achieve outcomes in a linear sequence with some reliability. If we are assiduous enough, pay attention to detail, and exercise rigorous control, the sequence will be seamless.</p><p><strong>In an unpredictable environment, this approach quickly falters. </strong></p><p>The longer and more rigorously we persist with it, the more quickly and completely things will break down. The environment we are in creates gaps between plans, actions, and outcomes: </p><ul><li>The gap between plans and outcomes concerns <strong>knowledge</strong>: It is the difference between what we would like to know and what we actually know. It means that we cannot create perfect plans. </li><li>The gap between plans and actions concerns <strong>alignment</strong>: It is the difference between what we would like people to do and what they actually do. </li><li>The gap between actions and outcomes concerns <strong>effects</strong>: It is the difference between what we hope our actions will achieve and what they actually achieve. </li></ul><p>We can never fully predict how the environment will react to what we do. It means that we cannot know in advance exactly what outcomes the actions of our organization are going to create. </p><p>Although it is not common to talk about these three gaps, it is common enough to confront them. It is also common enough to react in ways that make intuitive sense. </p><ul><li>Faced with a lack of knowledge, it seems logical to seek more detailed information. </li><li>Faced with a problem of alignment, it feels natural to issue more detailed instructions. </li><li>And faced with disappointment in the effects being achieved, it is quite understandable to impose more detailed controls. </li></ul><p>Unfortunately, these reactions do not solve the problem. In fact, they make it worse.</p><h3 id="three-principles-for-ensuring-alignment">Three principles for ensuring alignment</h3><p>Introduction to principles that help address alignment gaps in a complex organization and lead with intent. </p><p>1. Decide on what really matters</p><p>You cannot create perfect plans, so do not attempt to do so. Do not plan beyond the circumstances you can foresee. Instead, use the knowledge which is accessible to you to work out the outcomes you really want the organization to achieve. Formulate your strategy as an intent rather than a plan. </p><p>2. Get the message across</p><p>Having worked out what matters most now, pass the message on to others and give them responsibility for carrying out their part in the plan. Keep it simple. Don&#x2019;t tell people what to do and how to do it. Instead, be as clear as you can about your intentions. Say what you want people to achieve and, above all, tell them why. Then ask them to tell you what they are going to do as a result.</p><p>3. Give people space and support</p><p>Do not try to predict the effects your actions will have, because you can&#x2019;t. Instead, encourage people to adapt their actions to realize the overall intention as they observe what is actually happening. Give them boundaries which are broad enough to take decisions for themselves and act on them.</p><h2 id="part-2-why-look-for-inspiration-from-the-military-history">Part 2: Why look for inspiration from the military history?</h2><p>One benefit of moving far away in time and looking at the military rather than the business domain is to make it easier to spot the essentials. </p><p>If we can identify some principles, we can then apply them in our own specific context. </p><p>The environment faced by the military made the problem of strategy execution acute in the nineteenth century. In business the problem has only recently become similarly severe. As a result, the military has built up more experience of how to deal with the issues than we have in business. That experience is well documented and accessible. It is ours for the taking. We may find that the farther back we look, the farther forward we can see. </p><p>The word &#x201C;strategy&#x201D; comes from the Greek strategos (&#x3C3;&#x3C4;&#x3C1;&#x3B1;&#x3C4;&#x3B7;&#x3B3;&#x3CC;&#x3B6;), a military commander.</p><p>But of course, business is not war. To learn from military experience, we must adopt the right perspective. We are seeking to define the principles which enable large organizations to realize their goals and gain competitive advantage in a complex, uncertain, and fast-changing environment.</p><p>The following is a description of the nature of combat from an academic thesis about the nature of military thought: </p><ul><li>Combat is an interaction between human organizations. It is adversarial, highly dynamic, complex, and lethal. It is grounded in individual and collective human behavior and conducted between organizations that are themselves complex. It is not determined, hence uncertain, and evolutionary. Critically, and to an extent in a way which we currently overlook, combat is fundamentally a human activity.</li></ul><p>Compare that passage with this one which is characterized by Bungay (author): </p><ul><li>Business is an interaction between human organizations. It is competitive, highly dynamic, complex, and risky. It is grounded in individual and collective human behavior and conducted between organizations that are themselves complex. It is not determined, hence uncertain, and evolutionary. Critically, and to an extent in a way which we currently overlook, business is fundamentally a human activity.</li></ul><h3 id="the-concept-of-friction-and-its-application-to-business">The concept of friction and its application to business</h3><p>Clausewitz observed that armies find executing strategy difficult and developed the concept of friction to explain why. </p><p>Friction manifests itself when human beings with independent wills try to achieve a collective purpose in a fast-changing, complex environment where the future is fundamentally unpredictable. Friction is a universal phenomenon ultimately grounded in the basic fact of human finitude. </p><p>Its universality means that it applies in some degree to all organizational life, including business. It also means that we can never completely escape it. Our finite nature means that we have limited knowledge, due to things we could know but happen not to (because we do not have perfect information) and things we could not know even in principle (such as unpredictable future events). </p><p>It also means that we are independent agents. When we engage in a collective enterprise, we therefore face the problem of communicating with each other and aligning our individual wills. While we cannot become God, we can deal with the more tractable implications of our finitude. The first step is to recognize it. </p><p>Internal friction is exacerbated by the fact that in business as in war, we are operating in a nonlinear, semi-chaotic environment in which our endeavors will collide and possibly clash with the actions of other independent wills (customers, suppliers, competitors, regulators, lobbyists, and so on). </p><h3 id="friction-and-the-three-gaps">Friction and the three gaps</h3><p>The internal and external worlds are in constant contact and the effects of our actions are the result of their reciprocal interaction. Friction gives rise to three gaps: </p><ul><li>the knowledge gap</li><li>the alignment gap, and </li><li>the effects gap. </li></ul><p>To execute effectively, we must address all three. </p><p>Our instinctive reaction to the three gaps is to demand more detail. We gather more data to craft more detailed plans, issue more detailed instructions, and exercise more detailed control. This not only fails to solve the problem, but it also usually makes it worse. </p><p>We need to think about the problem differently and adopt a systemic approach to solving it.</p><p>Stephen (author) finds the concept of &#x201C;friction&#x201D; as the defining characteristic of the environment of war, which he argues is also the defining characteristic of contemporary business that makes executing strategy so difficult. Friction makes doing simple things difficult and difficult things impossible.</p><p>Friction creates gaps in alignment. The concept of friction is entirely consistent with systems thinking and chaos theory, but it is more useful to managers because it describes how working in a complex adaptive system is experienced. Its elements can be seen and felt, so we can more easily work out how to deal with them. Each gap in alignment (described by Stephen in a diagram) raises specific issues and requires us to take different steps to close it. </p><p>Clausewitz (Carl von Clausewitz, a Prussian general) believed that friction was as inherent to war as it is to mechanical engineering and could therefore never be eliminated but only mitigated. Secondly, he believed that studying march tables and the like was not a fruitful means of mitigation. In fact, he came to think that friction had to be worked with. </p><p>Friction provided opportunities and could be used by a general just as much as it could be used by an engineer. The first thing was to recognize its existence. The second thing was to understand its nature. That was and remains more difficult.</p><p>At another level, Clausewitz could be the first person in history to have had real insight into a fundamental factor governing organizational endeavor of any kind. No engineer would dream of designing an engine without considering the effects of mechanical friction. </p><p>If Clausewitz is right, no one should develop a strategy without considering the effects of organizational friction. Yet we continue to be surprised and frustrated when it manifests itself. We tend to think everything has gone wrong when in fact everything has gone normally. </p><p>The existence of friction is why armies need officers and businesses need managers. Anticipating and dealing with it form the core of managerial work. Recognizing that is liberating in upon itself.</p><p>If we are to deal with friction, we need to tease out its fundamental elements to distinguish them from specific examples and do so in such a way that we can then work out how to address them in practice. </p><p>To help us to do this, we are fortunate in being able to follow Clausewitz&#x2019;s thought processes over time, thanks to scholars who have examined the genesis of his concept of friction. This enables us to think along with him.</p><h3 id="sources-of-friction">Sources of friction</h3><p>In April 1812, Clausewitz wrote a letter to his pupil, the crown prince, listing eight sources of friction: </p><ol><li>Insufficient knowledge of the enemy</li><li>Rumors (information gained by remote observation or spies)</li><li>Uncertainty about one&#x2019;s own strength and position</li><li>The uncertainties that cause friendly troops to exaggerate their own difficulties</li><li>Differences between expectations and reality</li><li>The fact that one&#x2019;s own army is never as strong as it appears on paper</li><li>The difficulties in keeping an army supplied</li><li>The tendency to change or abandon well-thought-out plans when confronted with the vivid physical images and perceptions of the battlefield</li></ol><p>We experience friction because of our cognitive limits as human beings. We have limited knowledge about the present and the future is fundamentally unknowable. </p><p>Because war involves a struggle between two opposed wills, the outcome of any action taken by one party is at least in part dependent on the actions of the other. The amount of information each needs to take decisions is therefore in principle infinite, and is also in principle only partially accessible, as it involves an independent agent: the enemy. </p><p>Even if near-perfect information were accessible, it would be open to different interpretations, affected by the psychological states of those interpreting it, their interests, and emotions, and all heightened by the exposure to danger, the resulting stress, and the physical exertion inherent in war. </p><p>The more protagonists there are, the more interpretations are likely, and the harder it is to create a uniform view.</p><h3 id="importance-of-clarity">Importance of clarity</h3><p>Gathering and processing more information costs money and time. It is driven by a desire for certainty, a quest which can never be satisfied. Time passes and decision making slows down. </p><p>Providing more detail is a natural response to a demand for clarity. But clarity and detail are not the same thing at all. The pursuit of detail increases noise and so makes it less clear what really matters. Details change quickly, so the more details we put in our plans the less robust they will be.</p><h2 id="part-3-leadership-with-the-%E2%80%9Cauftragstaktik%E2%80%9D">Part 3: Leadership with the &#x201C;Auftragstaktik&#x201D;</h2><p>With darkness all around you, you must develop a feeling for what is right, often based on little more than guesswork, and issue orders in the knowledge that their execution will be hindered by all manner of random accidents and unpredictable obstacles.</p><p>In this fog of uncertainty, the one thing that must be certain is your own decision&#x2026; the surest way of achieving your goal is through the single-minded pursuit of simple actions.</p><p>To accomplish that single-mindedness, orders must be passed down &#x201C;to the last man.&#x201D; The army must be organized so that it is made up of units capable of carrying out unified action down to the lowest level. </p><h3 id="chain-of-command">Chain of command</h3><p>The chain of command and the communications process should ensure that instructions can be passed on. But the chain of command can get disrupted, and some tasks can only be carried out by mixed units put together for the purpose. </p><p>So, a clear chain of command is not enough, nor can processes dominate people. At all levels, people must remain in charge. </p><p>There are numerous situations in which an officer must act on his own judgment. For an officer to wait for orders at times when none can be given would be quite absurd. But as a rule, it is when he acts in line with the will of his superior that he can most effectively play his part in the whole scheme of things.</p><p>Specifying too much detail shakes confidence and creates uncertainty if things do not turn out as anticipated. Going into too much detail makes a senior commander a hostage to fortune, because in a rapidly changing environment, the greater the level of detail, the less likely it is to fit the actual situation.</p><p>It also creates uncertainty about what really matters. Far from overcoming it, a mass of instructions creates more friction in the form of noise and confuses subordinates because the situation may demand one thing and the instructions say another.</p><p>A leader who believes that he can make a positive difference through continual personal interventions is usually deluding himself. He thereby takes over things other people are supposed to be doing, effectively dispensing with their efforts, and multiplies his own tasks to such an extent that he can no longer carry them all out. </p><p>The demands made on a senior commander are severe enough as it is. It is far more important that the person at the top retains a clear picture of the overall situation than whether something detailed is done this way or that.</p><p>The higher the level of command, the shorter and more general the orders should be. The next level down should add whatever further specification it feels to be necessary, and the details of execution are left to verbal instructions or perhaps a word of command. </p><p>This ensures that everyone retains freedom of movement and decision within the bounds of their authority. It is vital that subordinates fully understand the purpose of the order, so that they can carry on trying to achieve it when circumstances demand that they act other than they were ordered to do.</p><h3 id="addressing-the-three-gaps-with-auftragstaktik">Addressing the three gaps with Auftragstaktik</h3><p>To close the knowledge gap, one needs to plan only what can be planned, the need for judgment and timely decision making based on what one can ascertain, and the acceptance of uncertainty. </p><p>A decision maker will of course seek to gather whatever relevant information they can in the time available. However, some residual uncertainty will always remain. Rather than seeking to fill the gap completely by gathering more data, von Moltke (a Prussian field marshal) suggests adjusting the scope of plans to the available knowledge and using it to identify the essentials.</p><h3 id="bi-directional-information-flow">Bi-directional information flow</h3><p>On the alignment gap, he recommends a cascade process with each level adding something to the one above, but all united by an understanding of the intentions of the higher levels. </p><p>Plans should be appropriate to their level: the lower the level, the more specific and detailed they should be. Each level will know less about the overall context and more about the specific situation than the level above. </p><p>So, the higher level should tell the lower level what it needs to know about the situation of the organization as a whole, the overall purpose, the immediate intention of the higher level, the specific role the unit is to play and the roles of other units around it, the freedoms it has, and any constraints it has to observe. That is all it needs to know. </p><p>With this knowledge of what to achieve and why, it should itself decide about how to achieve it. It will have more accurate and more up-to-date information about the situation it is facing and will therefore know best what specific actions to take. </p><p>By exercising self-restraint in telling its subordinate unit only what it needs to know, the higher-level unit clears space within which the subordinate is free to take decisions and act.</p><h3 id="autonomy-and-alignment">Autonomy and alignment</h3><p>On the effects gap, he encourages the use of individual initiative within boundaries and requires junior people to depart from the letter of their instructions if the situation demands it to fulfill the intent. Rather than tightening control, he suggests that so long as the intentions of higher levels are made clear, individual initiative can be relied on to adjust actions according to the situation. The imposed discipline of controls and sanctions is replaced by the self-discipline of responsibility. </p><p>There should be no fear of punishment if a calculated risk fails to pay off. Sins of omission should be regarded as far more serious than sins of commission.</p><p>Von Moltke&#x2019;s insight is that there is no choice to make. Far from it, he demands high autonomy and high alignment at one and the same time. He breaks the compromise. He realizes quite simply that the more alignment you have, the more autonomy you can grant. The one enables the other.</p><p>The insight is that alignment needs to be achieved around intent, and autonomy should be granted around actions. Intent is expressed in terms of what to achieve and why. Autonomy concerns the actions taken to realize the intent; in other words, about what to do and how. </p><h3 id="resulting-adaptability-and-self-reliance">Resulting adaptability and self-reliance</h3><p>Being able to adapt to circumstances, the organization will tend to make corrective decisions while executing, even if the overall plan is flawed. That may not guarantee a great strategy, but it does make it unlikely that the organization would career headlong into disaster, as the Prussian Army had in 1806. </p><p>By building this sort of capability, the risks of a flawed strategy have been mitigated because the intelligence of the whole organization has been applied to determining how the strategy unfolds, and that process has been so extended over time that it is for all practical purposes continuous.</p><p>He has in effect turned strategy development and strategy execution into a distinction without a difference. The corollary is that von Moltke did not have to wait to develop a perfect plan. He could go with one that was 70 percent right, because the organization would deal with the other 30 percent. </p><p>He did not need to know everything, he simply needed to be directionally correct.</p><h2 id="part-4-a-short-history-tour-of-auftragstaktik">Part 4: A short history tour of Auftragstaktik</h2><p>The moral and emotional basis of Auftragstaktik was not fear, but respect and trust. If every officer had the responsibility to exercise thinking obedience, they also had the responsibility to give clear direction. </p><p>Auftragstaktik recognizes that battle quickly becomes chaotic. It emphasizes independence of thought and action, stating that &#x201C;a failure to act or a delay is a more serious fault than making a mistake in the choice of means.&#x201D; </p><p>In the 1869 guidance von Moltke had made the distinction between an order (Befehl) and a directive (Direktive or Weisung). This entered general use. </p><p>In 1877, General Meckel wrote that a directive had two parts. The first was a description of the general situation and the commander&#x2019;s overall intention; the second was the specific task. Meckel stressed the need for clarity: &#x201C;Experience suggests,&#x201D; he wrote, &#x201C;that every order which can be misunderstood will be.&#x201D;</p><ol><li>The intention should convey absolute clarity of purpose by focusing on the essentials and leaving out everything else. </li><li>The task should not be specified in too much detail. Above all, the senior commander was not to tell his subordinate how he was to accomplish his task, as he would if were to issue an order. </li></ol><p>The first part of the directive was to give the subordinate freedom to act within the boundaries set by the overall intention. The intention was binding; the task was not. A German officer&#x2019;s prime duty was to reason why.</p><p>Every unit was to have its own clearly defined area of responsibility, and the freedom of unit commanders extended to a choice of form as well as means, which depended on specific circumstances. The responsibility of every officer was to exploit their given situation to the benefit of the whole.</p><p>The guiding principle of action was to be the intent of the higher commander. Officers were to ask themselves the question: &#x201C;What would my superior order me to do if he were in my position and knew what I know?&#x201D; </p><p>An understanding of intent was the essence of independent action.</p><h3 id="german-army-success-in-the-beginning-of-ww2">German army success in the beginning of WW2</h3><p>In 1933, the German Army produced a new guide to its leadership philosophy called Truppenf&#xFC;hrung (literally &#x201C;Troop Leadership&#x201D;), which marks the next stage in the maturity of Auftragstaktik. </p><p>It was issued to all officers. In it we read: The basis of leadership are the mission (Auftrag) and the situation. The mission identifies the goal to be achieved and must always be the point of focus. A mission which tries to encompass multiple tasks can all too easily obscure what really matters.</p><p>An uncertain situation is normal. It will rarely be possible to gain more accurate information about the state of the enemy. While you should obviously try to find out as much as possible, waiting for more information in a critical situation is seldom a sign of incisive leadership, and often a serious mistake. </p><p>The mission and the situation lead to a decision. If the mission no longer provides a sufficient basis for action, or if it is made redundant by events, the decision must take this into account. </p><p>If anyone changes a mission or does not carry it out, he must report the fact and he alone bears responsibility for the consequences. He must always act within the framework of the whole. </p><p>A decision should pursue a clear goal with all the means available. It is the resolution of the leader which carries it through. The will to succeed can in itself often bring about success. </p><p>Once a decision has been made, it should only be departed from in exceptional circumstances. In the vicissitudes of war, however, sticking rigidly to a decision can also be a mistake. Part of the art of leadership is to recognize the time and circumstances in which a new decision is called for. </p><p>A leader must grant his subordinates freedom of action as long as doing so does not compromise his intention. He must not, however, allow them to make a decision for which he is responsible.</p><h3 id="failure-of-the-auftragstaktik-towards-the-end-of-ww2">Failure of the Auftragstaktik towards the end of WW2</h3><p>A contributing factor to the German defeat was Hitler&#x2019;s contempt for the principles of Auftragstaktik and his attempts to reverse its practice, particularly on the Eastern Front from 1942 onward.</p><p>Running through the whole conception was the principle of trust. Hitler had never trusted his generals. As long as they won battles for him, he left them alone, but as the demands he placed on them grew and the scope of the war extended beyond Germany&#x2019;s ability to fight it, so success faltered.</p><p>As half-victories turned into defeats, his mistrust grew, and with it his interference and the level of detail he tried to manage. Auftragstaktik is not popular with tyrants.</p><h3 id="from-auftragstaktik-to-mission-command">From Auftragstaktik to mission command</h3><p>In 1977 US Army Colonel Trevor Dupuy reluctantly concluded: On a man for man basis, the German ground soldier consistently inflicted casualties at about a 50% higher rate than they incurred from the opposing British and American troops under all circumstances. This was true when they were attacking and when they were defending, when they had a local numerical superiority and when, as was usually the case, they were outnumbered, when they had air superiority and when they did not, when they won and when they lost. </p><p>Today, the operational manuals of organizations like the US Marine Corps or the British Army all contain passages which could have been lifted from Truppenf&#xFC;hrung.</p><p>There is a method for developing plans, breaking them down, and using them to brief subordinates. There is a procedure, which the military calls &#x201C;mission analysis,&#x201D; to help subordinates to draw out the implications of what they have been asked to achieve. </p><p>After briefings, subordinates then go through a process of &#x201C;backbriefing&#x201D; their superiors to check their understanding of the intent and its implications before passing it down the line to their own subordinates in a cascade. These techniques create internal predictability, which helps when the environment is chaotic, and allow scalability.</p><h2 id="part-5-back-to-the-world-of-business">Part 5: Back to the world of business</h2><p>Shortly after becoming Chairman and CEO of GE in 1981, Jack Welch read a letter in Fortune magazine written by Kevin Peppard, Business Development Director of Bendix Heavy Vehicle Systems. Bungay quotes the letter in full, what follows here are some outtakes: </p><p>&#x201C;Through your excellent series on the current practice of strategic planning runs a common thread: the endless quest by managers for a paint-by-numbers approach, which would automatically give them answers. Yet they continually fail in that pursuit. I am struck by the parallel to military strategists. Before the French Revolution, generals had seen military strategy as a matter of geometry, with precise rules to observe&#x2026; Precepts had abounded&#x2026; then Napoleon disproved all the maxims&#x2026; Detailed planning necessarily failed, due to the inevitable frictions encountered: chance events, imperfections in execution and the independent will of the opposition. Instead, the human elements were paramount: leadership, morale, and the almost instinctive savvy of the best generals... Business and war may differ in objectives and codes of conduct. But both involve facing the independent will of other parties. Any cookbook approach is powerless to cope with the independent will, or with the unfolding situations of the real world.&#x201D;</p><p>Nevertheless, why should the results of these endeavors be of interest to us today? </p><p>First, they represent one of the earliest, well-documented attempts in the modern age to create a system of what we now call &#x201C;empowerment,&#x201D; granting wide freedom of action to junior members of a large, complex organization.</p><p>The desirability of doing so was not generally accepted in the business world until well into the latter half of the twentieth century. Indeed, during the first half of that century, business went the other way.</p><h3 id="from-mission-command-to-what-bungay-calls-%E2%80%9Cdirected-opportunism%E2%80%9D">From mission command to what Bungay calls &#x201C;directed opportunism&#x201D;</h3><p>Management is not a science but a practical art. Practicing it skillfully means applying general principles in a specific context.</p><p>The name Bungay has chosen for mission command in business is &#x201C;directed opportunism.&#x201D; </p><p>Solution constitutes a system and enacting it involves going round a loop. It involves abandoning the linear model of developing a strategic plan and then implementing it. Instead, there is a cycle of thinking and doing. The horizon within which actions are planned is limited, the effects of the actions are observed, reflected on, and new action initiated. So, the thinking &#x2013; doing loop becomes a learning &#x2013; adapting loop.</p><p>An organization which behaves in this way will be observed to act rapidly and keep adjusting what it does. So, the &#x201C;plan-and-implement model&#x201D; of strategy becomes a &#x201C;do-and-adapt&#x201D; model. </p><p>Strategy development and execution merge into one circular process. </p><p>People whose self-understanding is a version of Noll&#x2019;s, who see themselves as functionaries, the servants of a process, or cogs in a machine, behave quite differently from those who understand themselves as independent agents bearing some responsibility for the achievement of a collective purpose and as part of a living organism.</p><p>The role of strategy</p><p>Strategy is a framework for decision-making, a guide to thoughtful, purposive action. </p><p>Why does a business need a strategy in the first place? As a collective enterprise, a business organization needs to act cohesively. It may have a very clear vision or sense of purpose, and for some types of organization that can suffice to provide the cohesion needed. However, it is unlikely to suffice for a business. </p><p>A business is a collective enterprise that must prosper in a competitive environment. Before the 1970s, business success was widely regarded as a matter of participating in attractive markets. As everybody followed this precept, competition within these markets increased, making them less attractive, and returns became mediocre.</p><p>The fundamental purpose of most businesses is to <strong>create value</strong>, often measured by, and sometimes identified with, the value created for shareholders. </p><p>From the point of view of those responsible for directing the business, that <strong>does not specify how value is to be created</strong>. From the point of view of the members of the organization, it does not tell them what they are supposed to do. </p><p>They need some direction, and what makes that direction strategic is that it answers the question: <strong>&#x201C;How are we going to compete?&#x201D; </strong></p><p><strong>A good strategy is derived from insight into the basis of competition.</strong></p><p>Answering the question &#x201C;How are we going to compete?&#x201D; prepares us for a collision with a series of independent wills outside the organization: those of customers, who may appear to be well disposed but who are ultimately unconcerned about our fate; and those of competitors, who, though they may share some common interests, are ultimately out to thwart us. </p><p>We may have allies in the form of suppliers, but we must engage them too with our enterprise or face unreliability, or even a war on two fronts. Then there are others. such as regulators, legislators, the media, and moneylenders, who may help or hinder us, stick by us through thick and thin, or demand kilograms of flesh at inopportune moments, but all of whom shape an environment of shifting constraints.</p><p>Because it involves preparation, we tend to identify strategy with a plan. This is dangerous. </p><p>Our quest for certainty can lead us to fall into the trap set by the knowledge gap and try to make perfect plans. This amounts to a failure to face reality.</p><p>In 1871, von Moltke wrote a three-page essay called &#x201C;On Strategy&#x201D; which confronts us with that reality. &#x201C;The aspiration of strategy,&#x201D; he wrote, is &#x201C;to achieve the highest end it can with the means available.&#x201D;</p><p>The first task of the strategist is to make resources available and deploy them. Initial resource deployment must be broadly correct, for it cannot be made good later. <strong>Here, detailed planning is required well in advance of any action.</strong></p><p>Things are different, however, in the next main task of strategy: <strong>the use of these resources on operations.</strong> For here, we encounter the independent will of an opponent, which we can constrain but not command.</p><p>No plan of operations can extend with any degree of certainty beyond the first encounter with the enemy&#x2019;s main body. </p><p>Only a layman could imagine that in following the course of a campaign he is watching the logical unfolding of an initial idea conceived in advance, thought out in every detail and pursued through to its conclusion. </p><p>Whatever the vicissitudes of events, a commander will need to keep his mind fixed unwaveringly on his main objectives, but he can never be certain beforehand which paths offer the best hopes of realizing them. Throughout the campaign he will find himself forced to make a whole series of decisions as situations arise which no one was able to predict.</p><p>In strategy there are no general rules or theorems of any practical value, von Moltke observes. It is not a science, and a good strategy is not enough to guarantee success: Indeed, strategy provides tactics with the means of beating the enemy and can increase the chances of success through the way in which it directs armies and brings them together on the battlefield. </p><p>On the other hand, strategy builds on every successful engagement to exploit it further. </p><p>Strategy is a system of expedients. It is more than science, it is the application of knowledge to practical life, the evolution of an original guiding idea under constantly changing circumstances, the art of taking action under the pressure of the most difficult conditions.</p><p>Surely, if a strategy has any value, it must be something we are doing now. It must inform operations. What we do operationally must be grounded in strategy, it must provide its rationale. Operations must be the manifestation of strategy. Otherwise, the organization would be doing things without knowing where it was heading or what it was trying to achieve. It would be blind.</p><p>A business in a socialist economy needs a plan, which requires the administrative resource-allocation skills of a manager. A business in a market economy needs a strategy, which requires the additional skills of a commander who can allocate resources to gain a competitive advantage.</p><p>Rather than a plan, a strategy is a framework for decision making. It is an original choice about direction, which enables subsequent choices about action. It prepares the organization to make those choices. Without a strategy, the actions taken by an organization degenerate into arbitrary sets of activity. </p><p>A strategy enables people to reflect on the activity and gives them a rationale for deciding what to do next. A robust strategy is not dependent on competitors doing any single thing. It does not seek to control an independent will. Instead, it should be a &#x201C;system of expedients&#x201D; &#x2013; with the emphasis on system.</p><h3 id="the-role-of-strategy">The role of strategy</h3><p>Strategy is a framework for decision-making, a guide to thoughtful, purposive action. </p><p>Why does a business need a strategy in the first place? As a collective enterprise, a business organization needs to act cohesively. It may have a very clear vision or sense of purpose, and for some types of organization that can suffice to provide the cohesion needed. However, it is unlikely to suffice for a business. </p><p>A business is a collective enterprise that must prosper in a competitive environment. Before the 1970s, business success was widely regarded as a matter of participating in attractive markets. As everybody followed this precept, competition within these markets increased, making them less attractive, and returns became mediocre.</p><p>The fundamental purpose of most businesses is to create value, often measured by, and sometimes identified with, the value created for shareholders. </p><p>From the point of view of those responsible for directing the business, that does not specify how value is to be created. From the point of view of the members of the organization, it does not tell them what they are supposed to do. </p><p>They need some direction, and what makes that direction strategic is that it answers the question: &#x201C;How are we going to compete?&#x201D; </p><p>A good strategy is derived from insight into the basis of competition.</p><p>Answering the question &#x201C;How are we going to compete?&#x201D; prepares us for a collision with a series of independent wills outside the organization: those of customers, who may appear to be well disposed but who are ultimately unconcerned about our fate; and those of competitors, who, though they may share some common interests, are ultimately out to thwart us. </p><p>We may have allies in the form of suppliers, but we must engage them too with our enterprise or face unreliability, or even a war on two fronts. Then there are others. such as regulators, legislators, the media, and moneylenders, who may help or hinder us, stick by us through thick and thin, or demand kilograms of flesh at inopportune moments, but all of whom shape an environment of shifting constraints.</p><p>Because it involves preparation, we tend to identify strategy with a plan. This is dangerous. </p><p>Our quest for certainty can lead us to fall into the trap set by the knowledge gap and try to make perfect plans. This amounts to a failure to face reality.</p><p>In 1871, von Moltke wrote a three-page essay called &#x201C;On Strategy&#x201D; which confronts us with that reality. &#x201C;The aspiration of strategy,&#x201D; he wrote, is &#x201C;to achieve the highest end it can with the means available.&#x201D;</p><p>The first task of the strategist is to make resources available and deploy them. Initial resource deployment must be broadly correct, for it cannot be made good later. Here, detailed planning is required well in advance of any action.</p><p>Things are different, however, in the next main task of strategy: the use of these resources on operations. For here, we encounter the independent will of an opponent, which we can constrain but not command.</p><p>No plan of operations can extend with any degree of certainty beyond the first encounter with the enemy&#x2019;s main body. </p><p>Only a layman could imagine that in following the course of a campaign he is watching the logical unfolding of an initial idea conceived in advance, thought out in every detail and pursued through to its conclusion. </p><p>Whatever the vicissitudes of events, a commander will need to keep his mind fixed unwaveringly on his main objectives, but he can never be certain beforehand which paths offer the best hopes of realizing them. Throughout the campaign he will find himself forced to make a whole series of decisions as situations arise which no one was able to predict.</p><p>In strategy there are no general rules or theorems of any practical value, von Moltke observes. It is not a science, and a good strategy is not enough to guarantee success: Indeed, strategy provides tactics with the means of beating the enemy and can increase the chances of success through the way in which it directs armies and brings them together on the battlefield. </p><p>On the other hand, strategy builds on every successful engagement to exploit it further. </p><p>Strategy is a system of expedients. It is more than science, it is the application of knowledge to practical life, the evolution of an original guiding idea under constantly changing circumstances, the art of taking action under the pressure of the most difficult conditions.</p><p>Surely, if a strategy has any value, it must be something we are doing now. It must inform operations. What we do operationally must be grounded in strategy, it must provide its rationale. Operations must be the manifestation of strategy. Otherwise, the organization would be doing things without knowing where it was heading or what it was trying to achieve. It would be blind.</p><p>A business in a socialist economy needs a plan, which requires the administrative resource-allocation skills of a manager. A business in a market economy needs a strategy, which requires the additional skills of a commander who can allocate resources to gain a competitive advantage.</p><p>Rather than a plan, a strategy is a framework for decision making. It is an original choice about direction, which enables subsequent choices about action. It prepares the organization to make those choices. Without a strategy, the actions taken by an organization degenerate into arbitrary sets of activity. </p><p>A strategy enables people to reflect on the activity and gives them a rationale for deciding what to do next. A robust strategy is not dependent on competitors doing any single thing. It does not seek to control an independent will. Instead, it should be a &#x201C;system of expedients&#x201D; &#x2013; with the emphasis on system.</p><h3 id="strategy-under-uncertainty">Strategy under uncertainty</h3><p>For example, there may be big changes expected in technology or regulations which will affect our markets profoundly over the next few years but their exact nature and timing are unknown. </p><p>We may not need to worry about that very much, though; arriving at Los Angeles might serve us as well as arriving at San Francisco. The important thing is to get going. </p><p>With a broad sense of what changes are likely, we can get away with a compass heading like &#x201C;Go west&#x201D; and keep our future options open. </p><p>On the other hand, if short-term uncertainty is very high because the markets are currently very turbulent, we may not be able to say whether to go west or north over the next few months. However, we may be clear about where we want to get to when things have calmed down. In that case the destination will give a capable organization enough direction to be able to duck and weave its way through the uncertain period and emerge in a better place than it started in.</p><p>We need to make decisions which are &#x201C;about right &#x2013; now,&#x201D; take action to change the situation, and then move on to the next decision. The laws of probability dictate that if our decisions are reasonably good, we will avoid disaster and are likely to do quite well. We will certainly outperform someone who tries to take one big decision about how to do everything or someone who makes no decisions at all. </p><p>We manipulate luck by making a series of small choices which open further options. To be good at this we need knowledge, but also judgment and skill acquired through native talent and training. Doing strategy is a craft which, like all practical skills, can only be mastered through practice, by learning from our own and others&#x2019; experience.</p><h3 id="strategy-and-operations">Strategy and operations</h3><p>However, the relationship between strategy and operations, between strategy development and strategy execution, is reciprocal: &#x201C;strategy builds on every successful engagement to exploit it further.&#x201D; Strategy is about fighting the right battles, the important ones you are likely to win. Operations are about winning them. The intelligent way to manipulate luck is to observe the effects of actions and exploit successes. The organization thus goes round the thinking &#x2013; doing loop.</p><p>All we can observe is an organization taking actions. Whether the consequences were intended or not makes no difference, but we can still distinguish strategy from operations. Operations are about doing things right. They involve reacting to problems and eliminating weaknesses, because in conducting operations you are as strong as the weakest link. </p><p>You can improve by imitating others, because achieving operational excellence means adopting best practice. Strategy, in contrast, is about doing the right things. It involves proactively shaping events and investing in strengths, because in creating a strategy you must make choices, to decide to do some things and not to do others. </p><p>You can shift the odds in your favor by differentiating yourself from others, because a good strategy seeks uniqueness.</p><h3 id="developing-strategy">Developing strategy</h3><p>In assessing ends and means, we have above all to be realistic. Developing strategy is an intellectual activity. It involves discerning facts and applying rationality.</p><p>There are people who possess a highly refined ability to penetrate the most demanding problems, who do not lack the courage to shoulder many burdens, but who nevertheless cannot reach a decision in difficult situations. Their courage and their insight stand apart from each other, never meet, and in consequence they cannot reach a decision. Conviction results from an act of mind which realizes that it is necessary to take a risk and by virtue of that realization creates the will to do so&#x2026; the sign of a genius for war is the average rate of success.</p><p>Insights into the center of gravity of a business and hence innovative strategies tend to come from people of long experience who have an unusual capacity to reflect on that experience in such a way that they become aware of the patterns it shows. This awareness enables them to understand how all the elements of their experience relate to each other so that they can grasp and articulate the essentials.</p><p>Because they base their decisions on that understanding, and because that understanding is sound, they tend in the long run to get more things right than wrong and so demonstrate the above-average success rate that Clausewitz identifies as marking them out. We tend to speak of them as having &#x201C;good judgment.&#x201D; In their field they do. But because it is grounded in pattern recognition, the quality of their judgment is dependent on context, and they do not necessarily display it in every area of human activity.</p><h3 id="summary-on-strategy">Summary on strategy</h3><p>A business strategy sets direction by considering both the ends to be achieved and the means of achieving them in a competitive environment. Means include execution. </p><p>Strategy development and strategy execution stand in a reciprocal relationship and codetermine each other. A strategy is not in itself a plan, but prepares the organization for the future by providing it with a framework for decision making, based on some basic choices about how to compete. It is &#x201C;the evolution of an original guiding idea under constantly changing circumstances.&#x201D; Depending on the nature of the uncertainties in the environment, a strategy can set direction by giving a compass heading or a destination, or both. </p><p>A robust strategy does not guarantee success, but shifts the odds in one&#x2019;s favor. Thinking strategically involves &#x201C;going round the loop&#x201D; to establish coherence between aims, opportunities, and capabilities. It is a rational activity involving analysis, experience, and pattern recognition to generate insight into the basis of competition, the center of gravity of the business. Good strategies involve risk, but they are realistic, not heroic. </p><p>A strategy is fundamentally an intent: a decision to achieve something now in order to realize an outcome; that is, a &#x201C;what&#x201D; and a &#x201C;why.&#x201D; Even if our destination is unclear, we need some sense of the end-state to be achieved which gives our current actions a purpose. And even if the current situation is volatile, we need to decide what to do next to get into a better position than we are in at present. </p><p>Strategic thinking can therefore be laid out as a staircase: a logical sequence of steps which lead to an end-state, which is either the destination or a position which opens future options. The steps of the staircase define the organization&#x2019;s &#x201C;main effort&#x201D; at a strategic level. The main effort is that single thing which will either have the greatest impact or on which all other things depend. It has resourcing priority. Defining main effort creates focus and energy, helps people to make trade-offs, and cuts through complexity.</p><h2 id="part-6-execution">Part 6: Execution</h2><p>Complexity is the most insidious enemy of execution. If the environment is complex, the temptation is to mirror the complexity internally. If it is fast changing, the temptation is to match it with the pace of internal change. In fact, if an organization is to cope it needs to create as much internal predictability as it can and to make things simple.</p><h3 id="strategy-briefing-and-backbriefing">Strategy briefing and backbriefing</h3><p>A typical list of things a manager must achieve in a year might look like this: </p><ol><li>Increase revenue by 8%</li><li>Raise average net margin to 15% </li><li>Open a new office </li><li>Reduce costs by 5% </li><li>Hire five new sales people </li><li>Increase employee satisfaction </li><li>Complete negotiations on a long-term contract </li><li>Introduce the new credit control system </li></ol><p>Using the concepts of the strategy briefing, a first run through the list could reveal the following:</p><ol><li>Increase revenue by 8% (our potential main intent) </li><li>Raise average net margin to 15% (our potential main intent) </li><li>Open a new office (implied task supporting, delegate)</li><li>Reduce costs by 5% (implied task supporting) </li><li>Hire five new salespeople (implied task supporting, delegate) </li><li>Increase employee satisfaction (an outcome, possible metric) </li><li>Complete negotiations on a long-term contract (implied task supporting)</li><li>Introduce the new credit control system (separate task, delegate)</li></ol><p>An important corollary of unity of effort is the emphasis on clarity and simplicity. What matters about creating alignment around a strategy is not the volume of communication, but its quality and precision. </p><p>For something to be clear, it must first be made simple. What is not simple cannot be made clear.</p><p>In the &#x201C;backbrief&#x201D; three things happen: </p><ul><li>The first obvious thing is that the unit being briefed checks its understanding of the direction it has received or worked out. </li><li>Secondly, and less obviously, the superior gains clarity for the first time about what the implications of their own directions actually are and may revise them as a result. </li><li>Thirdly, it provides an opportunity to ensure alignment across the organization as well as up and down it. </li></ul><p>If everyone backbriefs together, the results can be checked for gaps, overlaps, and coherence. Adjustment follows. It is very difficult, and indeed is a waste of time, for someone to try to think through for themselves all the implications of what they are asking people to do two levels below them. </p><p>It is in this way that the senior people themselves get to grips with what the organization is going to do because of what they have specified. It is normal for them to get it slightly wrong the first time around. It is also quite normal for a strategy brief to require revision.</p><p>Regarding what is needed to make people change, we might modify them for an organization as the following: </p><ol><li>What is said is not yet heard. </li><li>What is heard is not yet understood. </li><li>What is understood is not yet believed. </li><li>What is believed is not yet advocated. </li><li>What is advocated is not yet acted on.</li><li>What is acted on, is not yet completed.</li></ol><p>There is an understandable tendency for leaders of organizations to concentrate on the first step, demanding enough in itself, and assume that once that has been achieved, their work is done. In fact, it has just begun.</p><p>This practice has been arrived at by trial and error. Experience suggests that understanding the immediate intention one level up is not enough to give full alignment if things change, and that understanding the intention three levels up is of little additional help. Two levels up is like &#x201C;Goldilocks&#x2019; porridge&#x201D;: it is just right. It puts people in the position of being able to answer the question: &#x201C;What would my boss want me to do if they were here now and knew what I know?&#x201D;</p><h3 id="recap-of-briefing-and-backbriefing">Recap of briefing and backbriefing</h3><p>People at all levels can find themselves in situations where they must exercise independent thinking obedience. They can only do so if the organization has already prepared them by providing them with the information, they need to take decisions. That information can be formulated as a statement of intent, which distills the strategy for everyone. That statement can then be broken down into its component parts and used to start a process of briefing each level. </p><p>A briefing should cover the higher intent, up to two levels up, the tasks that this implies for the unit concerned, where their main effort should lie, and their freedoms and constraints. Working this through in a structured way pays dividends in aligning the organization both up and down levels and across functions. </p><p>The whole organization can be aligned if briefing is done in a cascade, with each level adding more specificity to the tasks implied by the higher intent, and then presenting the results to the level above in a process called backbriefing. This checks mutual understanding, allows for adjustment of the original brief, and, when done collectively, helps alignment across functions. </p><p>A briefing cascade will only work properly if the organizational structure broadly reflects the task structure implied by the strategy. If it conflicts with the strategy, it should be changed before anything else. It requires an appropriate level of hierarchy of entities that can be made wholly or largely accountable for critical tasks, led by people who are skilled and experienced enough to make autonomous decisions.</p><h2 id="part-7-building-the-organization">Part 7: Building the organization</h2><p>The issue comes down to people. They are both the problem and the answer. Nothing happens unless the key people involved in it want it to, and if the top team does not stand four-squarely behind the strategy, it is doomed. They may not say that they disagree, but if there is a conflict between the strategy and their real convictions, you may as well not start. </p><p>Curiously, people&#x2019;s convictions tend to correlate with their interests. Their interests are largely determined by the structure and the compensation system. Both, therefore, must be examined to identify and remove any conflicts.</p><p>There are many reasons for adopting any particular organizational structure, and no single structure is good for all circumstances. Reasons may include the strategy, but are as likely to encompass the availability of people, the need to provide platforms for them, the need to emphasize some things at the expense of others, the need to separate some business units from others in order to protect their culture, and so on.</p><p>In the light of that requirement, here are three questions to ask: </p><ol><li>Can we identify organizational entities which can be made wholly or largely accountable for executing the key elements of the strategy to the extent that controls are in place to measure how well they are doing so?</li><li>Are the leaders of these units skilled and experienced enough to direct their units on a semi-autonomous basis and are they committed to the strategy?</li><li>Is there enough, but not too much, hierarchy, and does each level of the hierarchy have the decision rights it needs to play its part?</li></ol><p>Hierarchy is valuable. It allows one to take decisions on behalf of many, enabling an organization to carry out different collective actions simultaneously and cohesively. We are familiar with cases of having too much hierarchy, roles overlap and become unclear, effort is duplicated, decision making slows down, costs rise, and power becomes more important than knowledge. </p><p>However, it is also possible to have too little. If there is not enough hierarchy, effort fragments, local interests are optimized, scale and focus are lost, and cohesion dissipates. A hierarchy only works if it encompasses appropriate decision rights and responsibilities. Decision rights are appropriate if the person or group with the best knowledge and expertise in any given area can act in a timely manner without asking for permission. </p><p>So, for example, prices may be set by central marketing, regions allocate marketing budget, countries decide about the weight given to different distribution channels, and local sales organizations decide which customers to target. </p><p>If there is not enough hierarchy and local sales organizations report directly to the center, then either the center will dictate everything, resulting in massive information flows and rigidity, or there will be chaos as prices vary from place to place in a single market.</p><p>What does anyone need to know to take action? They need to know something about the overall intent. Armed with this knowledge, they themselves need to say what they are going to do as a result. In other words, they need to break down their task into further tasks implied by their main one, assign them, and pass the message on. </p><p>In order to close the communications loop, they need to repeat the message back up, adding the specific tasks they intend to undertake. This simple but critical step&#x2013;which is as obvious in theory as it is rare in practice, is called a &#x201C;backbrief&#x201D; (discussed earlier in this book summary). </p><h3 id="hiring-the-right-people">Hiring the right people</h3><p>To create that organization, von Moltke needed to recruit and develop the right people. While doing so did not depend on finding individuals of genius, it did depend on identifying and developing a body of people with the right talent and putting them in the right place in the organization. Here, there was a problem.</p><p>The purpose of the Academy was twofold. The first was to act as a rigorous selection mechanism. The second was not only to train professional skills, but to develop a group of people who would make similar judgments and behave in similar ways because they shared a common doctrine. The best junior officers with at least three years&#x2019; service could apply for a &#x201C;high potentials&#x201D; course which would lead to entry into the General Staff.</p><p>The questions were mainly problems requiring a solution, and marks were awarded for the quality of the decision, the reasoning behind it, and the originality of approach. The objective was to identify potential based on clarity of reasoning and decision-making ability.</p><p>Von Moltke regarded the War Academy as one of his most important instruments for building the organization he wanted. The General Staff course passed out only the best of the best. The syllabus of the War Academy was designed not simply to build skills, but to impart a shared approach and ethos. The single aspect of performance emphasized more than any other was individual initiative and responsibility.</p><p>Von Moltke supervised his high potentials program himself, and spent two weeks of every year from 1858 to 1881 leading 20&#x2013;40 officers on a staff ride, and so directly influenced the thought processes of the people at the top of his organization. They were taught to identify the essentials of a situation and act rapidly and incisively. They were taught to recognize patterns and use their intuition, to take decisions which were &#x201C;about right &#x2013; now&#x201D; rather than wait for more information, and then take another decision as they saw the effects of the first. They were taught to think independently and use their own judgment; one exercise put officers in a position in which they had to disobey orders in order to be successful.</p><p>Von Moltke reinforced the behavioral norms in the way he reacted to mistakes. He knew that punishing one case of misjudgment would kill off every attempt to foster initiative in the officer corps for years to come. &#x201C;It is easy to pass judgment after the event,&#x201D; he wrote. &#x201C;For that reason, one should be extremely careful before condemning generals.&#x201D; That notion was made official, and applied not merely to generals but to all officers. The Field Service Regulations of 1888 contain the sentence: &#x201C;All commanders must always be aware that an omission or failure to act is a graver charge than making a mistake in the choice of means.&#x201D; </p><p>Superior officers were instructed to refrain from harsh or wounding criticism of mistakes lest it undermine the self-confidence of subordinates, to praise the fact that they did show initiative, and to correct them in such a way that they learn. Otherwise, as one general wrote, &#x201C;you will extinguish a hundred positive initiatives in order to prevent one error, and thereby lose a tremendous amount of energy.&#x201D;</p><p>We realize that employees &#x2013; all of us &#x2013; won&#x2019;t always be right, but it is better that they make mistakes than not try to solve customers&#x2019; problems. We discourage our managers from coming down on an employee like a ton of bricks if the decision the employee made was wrong. Instead, we want managers to explain why the decision was wrong and what the right decision should have been, so that the next time the employee is confronted with a similar situation he or she will get it right.</p><p>If Tracy&#x2019;s employer (from a story mentioned in the book) wants her to use the space it gives her to be adaptive, it will be careful about how it selects her, the training she gets, the environment it places her in, and what it expects of those who lead her.</p><p>Autonomy is granted only after a rigorous process.</p><h3 id="developing-people">Developing people</h3><p>We would be well advised to bear in mind the difference between being ready, willing, and able. If things are not happening as we want, we tend to assume that people have not understood. </p><p>Sometimes, however, repeating the message does not have any effect. Sometimes, people understand it quite well, but do not see what is in it for them, do not believe the organization is capable of doing it, or doubt that it means what it says. </p><p>People only show independent thinking obedience if they have the means to do so and are operating within a network of trust. The first thing is to get the right people into the network in the first place.	</p><p>It is important who you let through the door in the first place, and what positions you put them in. Just as some can act as multipliers, so others are dividers. Some people are not suited to the principles of directed opportunism. </p><p>They fall into two main groups. Those in one group like being told exactly what to do and following procedures. They are uncomfortable with responsibility and lack the self-confidence to exercise independent judgment. So, their default behavior pattern is to delegate upward by continually asking for direction. </p><p>The other group consists of natural authoritarians who only feel safe if they have total personal control. They are uncomfortable with uncertainty and lack the trust in others to delegate. Their default behavior pattern is to micromanage and punish deviation from set procedures. </p><p>Both groups are a problem, though the severity of the problem varies widely.</p><p>Sometimes, if their subordinates are relatively inexperienced or of low competence, micromanagement may be appropriate. The type of direction and the amount of space given to any subordinate must be appropriate for their skills and experience.</p><p>Nevertheless, few business organizations are large enough to be able to afford an all out academy. Answer is to focus the training and development effort on the critical groups of people, to do some training on the job, and to propagate the methods required outside of the classroom.</p><p>It is not necessary to train everybody in the organization in order to inculcate directed opportunism. The key group is upper &#x2013; middle management, people running a department or unit who are senior enough to have to make strategic decisions. Typically, this is two levels below the executive board. </p><p>They need to master the disciplines of strategic thinking and briefing. If the development effort is focused on them, they will then pass down the skills and develop them in those working for them. Because they have day-to-day operational roles, they will have a greater influence on culture and behavior than more senior executives.</p><p>Training of this kind cannot be theoretical. It only works if it takes the actual situation as its starting point. The best way to do that is by running workshops designed to support the development and promulgation of the current strategy. </p><p>First time around the results will not be perfect, but they will be better than otherwise. The second time, things will go more smoothly, and the results will generally be clearer and more incisive. After that, occasional reinforcement will maintain quality. Doing it for real every time speeds up learning.</p><h3 id="drivers-of-behavior">Drivers of behavior</h3><p>While it will not guarantee such alignment, good formalized or semi-formalized briefing and backbriefing will tend to flush out incongruities. It is not designed to make personal goals and aspirations explicit, but it does force people to reflect about whether they are really willing to undertake the task assigned to them and gives them the opportunity to challenge it. If they are of good will, it can counteract unintended consequences of the kind described. </p><p>If they are not of good will, it makes it harder for them to hide. If they are not of good will and clever enough to keep their real motives hidden, one has a different kind of problem.</p><h3 id="keeping-score-kpis-and-other-indicators">Keeping score: KPIs and other indicators</h3><p>Organizations like processes, but they adore metrics. The knowledge gap acts like a vacuum which sucks metrics in. Their precision creates the satisfying illusion that they lack ambiguity, and our ability to collect and collate them creates an equally seductive feeling of control. </p><p>As advances in technology over the last 15 years or so have allowed the collection and dissemination of ever more measures, adoration has turned into infatuation. Infatuation leads to perversity. Metrics become an end in themselves and get separated from what it was they were intended to measure in the first place. They become a fetish.</p><p>This danger is particularly pronounced if the metrics are not simply monitored to see whether things are on track but are turned into targets which define performance and hence individuals&#x2019; success. If they are furthermore linked to compensation, the danger becomes acute. For then, if faced with a choice between optimizing targets and optimizing what really matters, people optimize the targets.</p><p>Target setting is not inherently bad; far from it. But the practice leaves a lot to be desired. It is precisely because measurable targets are so powerful that we need to treat them with great care. What gets measured gets done. That is the beauty of it. The Beauty can turn into a Beast. What gets measured gets done&#x2013;and nothing else. </p><p>If we are not careful, we may get exactly what we have asked for, and regret it.</p><p>The first thing is that &#x2013; all protestations to the contrary apart &#x2013; a scorecard is fundamentally a control system, whereas the prime purpose of strategy is command; that is, setting direction. Unless the &#x201C;what&#x201D; and the &#x201C;why&#x201D; are clear, the fetishization of the metrics is a near certainty. </p><p>To exercise command is to articulate an intention to achieve a desired outcome and align a system to behave in such a way that the outcome can be expected to be achieved. To exercise control is to monitor the actual effects resulting from the behavior, assess the information, and report on the system&#x2019;s performance with respect to the desired outcome. </p><p>It is then the function of command to decide what to do: to adjust the behavior of the system, take some other action outside the system, or indeed to abandon the original intention and change the desired outcome.</p><p>The fourth thing is that while no driver would undertake a journey in a car with no instrument panel, when they&#x2019;re actually driving good drivers spend most of their time looking through the windscreen at the road and the other traffic and react fast to what they see. Similarly, no company should neglect the need for a scorecard, but sophisticated measuring systems can encourage bad driving habits. </p><p>There is no substitute for direct observation, which is why von Moltke had a telescope, talked to people all the time, and had his own staff officers visit units and report back to him what they saw. He was not going to rely on reports. </p><p>An executive needs an up-to-date mental picture of what is going on in and around the business; a scorecard is only one source of information from which that picture can be formed.</p><p>In the final analysis it is behavior that counts. If we close the knowledge and the alignment gaps in the ways suggested so far, we will be able to gain traction, focus effort, and deliver a strategy &#x2013; until something unexpected happens, which sooner or later it will. At that point everything depends on people. </p><p>Metrics give us information. Interpreting the information can impart understanding. Taking the right action requires wisdom. Only people can have that.</p><h2 id="part-8-strategy-operations-and-tactics">Part 8: Strategy, operations, and tactics</h2><p>Routine tasks such as forming up a column of march or deploying a skirmishing line were standardized and everybody was trained in how to do them. Today, they include things such as forming a roadblock, and are called standard operating procedures or SOPs. They are very useful because they create uniformity and therefore predictability where that has high value. They enhance efficiency by enabling these tasks to be carried out at speed with little supervision.</p><p>The three levels tend to correspond naturally to levels in the organization:</p><ul><li>Strategy is about winning wars and involves armies; operations is about winning campaigns and involves corps and divisions; tactics is about winning battles and involves brigades, battalions, and companies. </li><li>We might say (very broadly) that strategy involves business units, operations involve departments and functions, and tactics involves sub-units, whether in support roles or with direct customer contact.</li></ul><p>Three-level thinking helps us to understand the legacy we have inherited from scientific management. Taylor had insights, and they endure. The prize is efficiency, and no business can afford to be inefficient. </p><p>Taylor&#x2019;s error was to universalize his approach and apply it to all business activity instead of restricting it to the realm of tactics. He thereby created a problem for businesses trying to follow his edicts 50 years later when the world had changed. The answer to that problem had been worked out another 50 years before him, but he was quite unaware of it. </p><p>One can hardly blame him. Some people who were aware of the source of the solution still could not see it.</p><h3 id="leading-and-managing">Leading and managing</h3><p>Managing means understanding objectives, solving problems so that they can be achieved, and creating processes so that the work of others can be organized efficiently. Good management means making the maximum use of resources, including money and people. </p><p>Leading is a human activity that is moral and emotional. The work of a leader is to motivate and if possible, inspire followers so that they are willing to go in the required direction and perform their own tasks better than they would have done had the leader not been there. </p><p>Leaders must balance their attention between defining and achieving the specific task of their group, building, and maintaining the team as a team, and meeting the needs of and developing the individuals within it. </p><p>Some inspiring leaders are poor managers, some brilliant commanders are ineffectual leaders, and some very efficient managers can neither command nor lead. In most organizations, all three sets of skills are equally important. This has two consequences. It means that although the circles overlap, each of us must be aware of what mode we are primarily operating in at any point in time; and it means that we must beware of how we select our commanders.</p><p>Executives who master the disciplines of formulating and giving good direction can explain to people what they must achieve and why, and so make them ready to act. By mastering management, they can put people into a position in which they are able to act. And by leading them effectively they can sustain people&#x2019;s willingness to carry on until the job is done.</p><h2 id="conclusion">Conclusion</h2><p>Leading-edge business thinker Philip Evans has pointed out that organizations like Linux and Toyota are self-organizing networks in which the overall intent is shared without being laid down. Linux has no single leader. </p><p>Self-organizing networks have all the characteristics we have observed to be cornerstones of directed opportunism: a lot of people taking independent decisions based on a shared intent and high mutual trust. The strong connection between the top and bottom of a hierarchy created by a briefing cascade is replaced by a strong network with widely dispersed knowledge and myriad dense interconnections.</p><p>This may not be a solution to everybody&#x2019;s problems, nor would it be practical for most organizations to transform themselves overnight into self-organizing networks. It may, however, reinforce the attractions of the compass heading I have been advocating.</p><blockquote>As I observed at the outset, what I am advocating is no more than common sense, but common sense is not so common in practice. -Stephen Bungay</blockquote><p>Winston Churchill is said to have observed: Most people, sometimes in their lives, stumble across truth. And most jump up, brush themselves off, and hurry on about their business as if nothing had happened, here is Bungay&#x2019;s summary of the book in some points: </p><ol><li>We are finite beings with limited knowledge and independent wills. </li><li>The business environment is unpredictable and uncertain, so we should expect the unexpected and should not plan beyond the circumstances we can foresee.</li><li>Within the constraints of our limited knowledge, we should strive to identify the essentials of a situation and make choices about what it is most important to achieve. </li><li>To allow people to take effective action, we must make sure they understand what they are to achieve and why. </li><li>They should then explain what they are going to do as a result, define the implied tasks, and check back with us.</li><li>They should then assign the tasks they have defined to individuals who are accountable for achieving them and specify boundaries within which they are free to act.</li><li>Everyone must have the skills and resources to do what is needed and the space to take independent decisions and actions when the unexpected occurs, as it will. </li><li>As the situation changes, everyone should be expected to adapt their actions according to their best judgment in order to achieve the intended outcomes. </li><li>People will only show the level of initiative required if they believe that the organization will support them.</li><li>What has not been made simple cannot be made clear and what is not clear will not get done.</li></ol><hr><p>See more great book notes <a href="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/notes/">here</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[LBS Newsletter #4: To the north]]></title><description><![CDATA[Since I moved further up north, I’ve been mind blown by how quickly autumn transitioned into a proper, snowy and white winter! ]]></description><link>https://www.lostbookofsales.com/newsletter/lbs-update-4/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">671116cdb5bcc265d735b6d6</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Santeri]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2021 11:32:28 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2021/11/santeri-lbs-joensuu.jpeg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2 id="hello-there-winter-%F0%9F%91%8B-%E2%9D%84%EF%B8%8F">Hello there, winter! &#x1F44B; &#x2744;&#xFE0F;</h2><img src="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2021/11/santeri-lbs-joensuu.jpeg" alt="LBS Newsletter #4: To the north"><p>Since I moved further up north, I&#x2019;ve been mind blown by how quickly autumn transitioned into a proper, snowy and white winter! <br><br>Many years ago I lived on the southern coast of Finland where snowy winters became increasingly rare. It was depressing to have just a couple of hours of sunlight per day while the rest of our time was spent in the darkness. It&#x2019;s not a good environment for a human to be in if you ask me! <br><br><strong>&#x26F7; &#x26F8; &#x1F6F7; &#x2603;&#xFE0F;</strong><br><br>We&#x2019;re getting ready to take out our ice-skates and skis to get the best of it! Let&#x2019;s see if a snowy white winter makes things more bearable, or dare I say even, enjoyable...?<br><br><strong>&#x270D;&#xFE0F; &#x1F4DA;</strong><br><br>Since the last time I wrote you, I&#x2019;ve published two new articles on some of the psychological principles that I got interested to write about thanks to Cialdini&#x2019;s book on Influence, you will find them below. </p><p>In addition to these two articles, I wanted to also share with you an idea I thoroughly enjoyed about what it means to be well-educated according to a widely respected cognitive scientist and philosopher Noam Chomsky. <br><br>Meanwhile I&#x2019;m wishing you a great weekend, and talk to you soon! I&#x2019;ll just head out into that snowfall&#x2026;<br><br>Best, <br>Santeri</p><hr><h2 id="the-principle-of-reciprocity-and-becoming-a-good-negotiator-%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%92%BC">The principle of reciprocity and becoming a good negotiator &#x1F468;&#x200D;&#x1F4BC; </h2><p><strong>&#x1F91D; Analyzing the idea behind reciprocity</strong></p><p>Do you remember feeling a little indebted to someone after receiving a valuable favor? <br><br>This is a great example of psychological reciprocation, a mechanism that is built into all of us as part of being social animals. After receiving a favor or a concession from someone else, most often you will justifiably feel like giving something back in return.<br><br>The principle of reciprocity is not only especially relevant in politics, business and diplomacy, both systematically and organically, as well as legally and illegally (in the form of corruption), but also a critically important factor in our daily lives, a fact that is quite interesting when examined more closely.<br><br>Read the <a href="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/the-principle-of-reciprocity-and-becoming-a-good-negotiator/">full post</a>.</p><hr><h2 id="what-it-means-to-be-truly-educated-%F0%9F%93%96">What it means to be truly educated &#x1F4D6;</h2><p><br><strong>&#x1F468;&#x200D; Hi, my name is Noam Chomsky,</strong><br><br>I&apos;m a retired professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology where I&apos;ve been for 65 years. I think I can do no better about answering the question of what it means to be truly educated than to go back to some of the classic views on the subject. <br><br>For example the views expressed by the founder of the modern higher education system, Wilhelm von Humboldt, leading humanist, a figure of the enlightenment who wrote extensively on education and human development and argued, I think, kind of very plausibly, that the core principle and requirement of a fulfilled human being is the ability to inquire and create constructively independently without external controls. <br><br>To move to a modern counterpart, a leading physicist who talked right here, used to tell his classes it&apos;s not important what we cover in the class, it&apos;s important what you discover. To be truly educated from this point of view means to be in a position to inquire and to create on the basis of the resources available to you which you&apos;ve come to appreciate and comprehend. To know where to look, to know how to formulate serious questions, to question a standard doctrine if that&apos;s appropriate, to find your own way, to shape the questions that are worth pursuing, and to develop the path to pursue them. <br><br>That means knowing, understanding many things but also, much more important than what you have stored in your mind, to know where to look, how to look, how to question, how to challenge, how to proceed independently, to deal with the challenges that the world presents to you and that you develop in the course of your self education and inquiry and investigations, in cooperation and solidarity with others. <br><br>That&apos;s what an educational system should cultivate from kindergarten to graduate school, and in the best cases sometimes does, and that leads to people who are, at least by my standards, well educated.<br><br>- Chomsky on being truly educated. As directly quoted from the <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYHQcXVp4F4">original video</a>.</p><hr><h2 id="commitment-and-consistency-%F0%9F%93%9D">Commitment and consistency &#x1F4DD;</h2><p><strong>&#x1F52E; Why do sales organizations forecast? </strong><br><br><em>&#x201C;A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.&#x201D; </em><br><br> &#xA0; &#xA0;- Ralph Waldo Emerson<br><br>We all strive for consistency and predictability, but at what cost? And when does it lead us in the wrong direction?<br><br>Say you approach a sales manager working in a large company and question him on why sales teams are required to forecast exact amounts of revenue for up to three months in advance? It&#x2019;s a valid question to ask as salespeople are often required to internally commit to getting a signature from a customer by a certain date, no matter the complexity of the deal.<br><br>Throw in the difficulty of &#x201C;committing&#x201D; to an exact deal size to be brought in, particularly when asked to be written down &#x201C;on paper&#x201D; at an early stage, and it can all sometimes feel borderline absurd. Why?<br><br>Read the <a href="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/commitment-and-consistency-why-sales-organizations-forecast/">full post</a>.</p><hr><p><strong>End note</strong></p><p>As always, thank you for your time and for being a great subscriber! &#xA0;&#x1F389;&#xA0;</p><p>In case you find this content interesting or useful, I&apos;d be super thankful if you could <a href="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/#subscribe">share the LBS</a> with one or two of your friends. You can also directly reply to this email if you have any feedback that I could incorporate into future issues.&#xA0;</p><p>Did you find an interesting article yourself? Let me know about that too! Maybe we can include it here next time.</p><p>All the best,<br>Santeri</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Commitment and consistency: Why do sales organizations forecast?]]></title><description><![CDATA[Say you approach a sales manager working in a large company and question him on why sales teams are required to forecast exact amounts of revenue for up to three months in advance? What's the answer you'll get?]]></description><link>https://www.lostbookofsales.com/commitment-and-consistency-why-sales-organizations-forecast/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">671116cdb5bcc265d735b6d5</guid><category><![CDATA[Sell 🤝]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Santeri]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2021 17:00:17 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2021/11/lbs-santeri-liukkonen-lappeenranta.jpeg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://www.lostbookofsales.com/content/images/2021/11/lbs-santeri-liukkonen-lappeenranta.jpeg" alt="Commitment and consistency: Why do sales organizations forecast?"><p>Let&apos;s kick things off with an unassuming quote:</p><blockquote>&#x201C;A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.&#x201D; - Ralph Waldo Emerson</blockquote><p>We all strive for consistency and predictability, but at what cost? And when does it lead us into a wrong direction?</p><p>Say you approach a sales manager working in a large company and question him on why sales teams are required to forecast exact amounts of revenue for up to three months in advance? It&#x2019;s a valid question to ask as salespeople are often required to internally commit getting a signature from a customer by a certain date, no matter the complexity of the deal. </p><p>Throw in the difficulty of &#x201C;committing&#x201D; to an exact deal size to be brought in, particularly when asked to be written down &#x201C;on paper&#x201D; at an early stage, and it can all sometimes feel borderline absurd. Why? </p><p>The answer you&#x2019;ll most probably get from the manager will be somewhere along the lines of: &#x201C;Our revenue forecasts are passed up to the leadership team so we can give appropriate guidance to our investors. As a a publicly traded company we have a lot of requirements we need to adhere to in terms of reporting, planning and decision-making&#x2026;&#x201D; </p><p>Does this mean that all reliable and consistent salespeople sought by companies are nowadays not just expected to bring in a ton of revenue, but need to rapidly start forecasting this revenue for up to three months in advance? Yes, and pigs can fly! </p><p>Nobody asks the weatherman to realistically forecast exact temperatures beyond the near future of 10-days, so why are salespeople committing their forecasts for over a quarter ahead? </p><p>Let&#x2019;s say we accept this practice in larger and more established companies with a strong product portfolio and a track record, but today you&#x2019;ll find the exact same practice followed by organizations of all sizes, including even the smallest and least established businesses or startups. Why all the craziness? </p><h2 id="the-psychological-factor-of-consistency">The psychological factor of consistency</h2><p>As Cialdini writes in his book <a href="https://amzn.to/3nCKqfV">Influence</a>, horse-race bettors are not alone in their willingness to believe in the correctness of a difficult choice once it is made. Indeed, we all fool ourselves from time to time to keep our thoughts and beliefs consistent with what we have already done or decided.</p><p>Once we realize the power of consistency is formidable in directing our own action and the actions of others, an important and practical question arises: How is that force engaged? What produces the click that activates the powerful consistency tape in our minds? Social psychologists think they know the answer, and it is commitment. </p><p>As Cialdini writes: &#x201C;If I can get you to make a commitment (that is, to take a stand, to go on record), I will have set the stage for your automatic and ill-considered consistency with that earlier commitment.&#x201D; </p><p>So once a stand is taken, there is a natural tendency to behave in ways that are stubbornly consistent with that stand.</p><p>Commitment strategies are often aimed at us by &#x201C;compliance professionals&#x201D; of nearly every sort. Each of the strategies is intended to get us to take some action or make some statement that will trap us into later compliance through consistency pressures, and this is what Cialdini talks about extensively in his book. </p><h2 id="additional-background">Additional background</h2><p>According to research findings mentioned in the book, it is then that we need to be very careful about agreeing to trivial requests (Freedman and Fraser). What can feel like a tiny agreement can not only increase our compliance with very similar, much larger requests, but it can also make us more willing to perform a variety of larger favors that are only remotely connected to the little one we did earlier. </p><p>It&#x2019;s this second, general kind of influence concealed within small commitments that should scare you. Signing up to something you are not sure about, say for example a petition, can be so powerful that it alters your self-image. For example, &#x201C;I&#x2019;m now an environmentalist&#x2026;&#x201D; And once person&#x2019;s self-image is altered, all sorts of subtle advantages become available to someone who wants to exploit that new image.</p><p>So, according to Cialdini, people can use small commitments to manipulate your self-image, and this has wide-spanning applications in all aspects of your life. Citizens can be turned into &#x201C;public servants&#x201D;, prospects into &#x201C;customers&#x201D;, prisoners into &#x201C;collaborators&#x201D;, and so on. And once they&#x2019;ve got your self-image where they want it, you should comply naturally with a whole range of requests that are consistent with this view of yourself.</p><p>According to a study mentioned in the book, people were asked to read and re-write a piece of text written by a person who, slightly sarcastically, admired a dictator. An interesting result of the study was that even if it may have been sarcastic, without any strong evidence to the contrary, people who read the text assumed that the writer really meant what he said. Without going deeper into results, when the readers were then asked to re-write the text themselves, the outcome, no matter how ridiculous it seems, had an effect in altering that person&#x2019;s own perception on the topic. &#xA0;</p><h2 id="spurring-sales-personnel-to-greater-and-greater-accomplishments">Spurring sales personnel to greater and greater accomplishments</h2><p>Cialdini states that back in the day, Amway Corporation hit upon a way to spur their sales personnel to greater and greater accomplishments. Members of the staff were asked to set individual sales goals and commit themselves to them by personally recording them on paper. </p><p>Ever since, many companies have learned a beautifully simple trick that makes salespeople perform much better than what they possibly otherwise would. They merely have the salesperson explicitly provide some effort and commit to their sales target instead of just plain and simply giving them out and waiting for results. &#xA0;</p><p>In simpler settings, this psychological principle holds true also in the form of asking customers to fill out order forms instead of a salesperson doing it for them. When a person has gone to commit something on paper, the heavy sub-conscious pressure of consistency is engaged. </p><p>As Cialdini states: &#x201C;According to the sales-training program of a prominent encyclopedia company, that personal commitment alone has proved to be a very important psychological aid in preventing customers from backing out of their contracts&#x201D;, continuing &#x201C;like the Amway Corporation, then, these organizations have found that something special happens when people personally put their commitments on paper: They live up to what they have written down.&#x201D;</p><h2 id="getting-your-customers-to-engage-with-you">Getting your customers to engage with you</h2><p>A thing to keep in mind is that the effort the counterparty needs to show and provide is critical. To be effective, one should not make the commitment too easy and hands-off for the counterparty. If they don&apos;t show with actions that they are doing things, you can directly consider it as a bad signal. </p><p>For example, you can give small pieces of &quot;good&quot; and interesting types of work to prospective customers for this effect to be in full play. To gauge the commitment level of a prospect, salespeople can therefore ask before a sales meeting for some agenda points to focus on, or when conducting an extensive sales case, involve stakeholders in some clever and subtle ways early in the process. </p><h2 id="what-are-the-implications-on-internal-communication">What are the implications on internal communication? </h2><p>As the saying goes: &#x201C;Underpromise and overdeliver?&#x201D;, right? </p><p>Cialdini writes: &#x201C;It appears that commitments are most effective in changing a person&#x2019;s self-image and future behavior when they are active, public, and effortful.&#x201D;</p><p>For leaders, as well as salespeople then, there is a key aspect to meditate upon for making sure that this psychological principle is effective, a fact that is often executed less than desirably in practice: &#xA0;</p><p>&#x201C;As social scientists have determined, we accept inner responsibility for a behavior when we think we have chosen to perform it in the absence of strong outside pressures. If we are forced by outside pressure, or encouraged by a large reward, it may get us to perform a certain action, but it won&#x2019;t get us to accept inner responsibility for the act.&#x201D;</p><p>This means that if the manager is forcing his salesperson to forecast a certain amount while the salesperson is reluctant, the effect will be lost. </p><p>&#x201C;Consequently, we won&#x2019;t feel committed to it. Strong threats or huge rewards might motivate immediate compliance, but they are unlikely to produce long-term commitment.&#x201D;</p><p>This is something we must keep in our minds. </p><h2 id="foolish-consistency">Foolish consistency</h2><p>Consistency is considered a hallmark of logic and intellectual strength by people among us, while lack of consistency, on the other hand, is what is often tied to intellectually scattered and weak people. Coming back to the quote Cialdini mentions in his book as said by Emerson: </p><p><em>&#x201C;A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.&#x201D; </em></p><p>The keyword here is &quot;foolish&quot;. Remembering this quote can be an effective defense against psychological weapons of influence, but perhaps also help us, as the Stoics would say, live a &quot;smoother flowing life&#x201D;.</p>]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>